Return Migration and the Profiling of Non‐Citizens: Highly Skilled BRIC Migrants in the Mexico–US Borderlands and Arizona's SB 1070

Abstract

Based on interviews conducted between 2011 and 2012, this paper examines how highly skilled migrants from Brazil, Russia, India, and China in Arizona have experienced acculturation to US racial norms and heightened anti‐immigration sentiment since 9/11, which in this state culminated in the passage of Senate Bill 1070. We found that negative experiences with incorporation into US racial hierarchies, immigration enforcement at the Mexico–US border, and profiling as ‘foreigners’ had little impact on their deliberations to return to countries that have become new engines for global growth at a time of US economic decline. Interviewees tended to interpret their experiences as having been mistaken for members of other targeted groups, expected exemption from SB 1070 because of their highly skilled and/or documented status, and lacked knowledge of a now defunct provision in the bill that would have affected immigrants by criminalising failure to carry proper documentation. Instead of immigration experiences or the economic downturn in the US, participants were deterred from return because of perceived deficiencies in their countries of origin, which mitigated the attractiveness of the new economic opportunities there. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The Impact of Punitive Immigrant Laws on the Health of Latina/o Populations

“…1070 has inspired a variety of studies ranging from analyzing the discourse of economic austerity undergirding the policy's framing (Swenson ), to its implications for uncovering authoritarian values in policing (Fisher et al . ), and its effects on the experiences of highly skilled migrants (Sadowski‐Smith and Li ). More closely related to the present study, research analyzing the health effects of the law has also increased.…”

The effect of perceived threat on human rights: A meta-analysis

“…It is important to reflect on the fact, however, that even ingroup-focused policies are not truly unbiased and equitable in their deployment. Laws such as Stop-And-Frisk in New York and SB 1070 in Arizona disproportionately targeted ethnic minorities (Gelman et al, 2007;Sadowski-Smith & Li, 2016) and police recording devices disproportionally have more "malfunctions" in minority majority neighborhoods (Daley, 2014). In the end, policy is made by groups, supported by groups, and applied inconsistently by groups towards other groups.…”

Policies for Recruiting Talented Professionals from the Diaspora: India and China Compared

“…Faculty interviewees specifically responded that now in China, compared to the situation in the US, it is easier to get research funding and good students. This is particularly obvious when compared to their Indian graduate students and faculty interviewee counterparts (Sadowski‐Smith and Li, ; Li et al., ).…”