2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Return of fear after retrospective inferences about the absence of an unconditioned stimulus during extinction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
21
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(44 reference statements)
2
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The SCR (lS) amplitude is the difference between the trough and the apex of the skin conductance level curve within 1 s to 8 s after CS onset (Prenoveau, Craske, Liao, & Ornitz, 2012). The amplitudes with corrected ranges were transformed to square roots prior to further analysis to normalize the data (Raes et al, 2011).…”
Section: Skin Conductance Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The SCR (lS) amplitude is the difference between the trough and the apex of the skin conductance level curve within 1 s to 8 s after CS onset (Prenoveau, Craske, Liao, & Ornitz, 2012). The amplitudes with corrected ranges were transformed to square roots prior to further analysis to normalize the data (Raes et al, 2011).…”
Section: Skin Conductance Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second difference from the study of Raes et al (2011) is the retrospective inference they required for participants to do, which was very simple. For example, there was a single cue included from AÀ/BÀ to A+/BÀ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations