2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Return to Play of Rugby Players After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft: Return to Sports and Graft Failure According to Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
37
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ACL graft revision rate was 5% after 6 years, in agreement with other studies from the Scandinavian4 5 13 and Kaiser Permanente registries 14. The revision rates in the registries are lower than reported from studies of competitive athletes,9–11 possibly since many of the ACL reconstructions in the registries are performed in recreational athletes with a lower activity level than competitive athletes. The revision rate in this study was about 6% after 10 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ACL graft revision rate was 5% after 6 years, in agreement with other studies from the Scandinavian4 5 13 and Kaiser Permanente registries 14. The revision rates in the registries are lower than reported from studies of competitive athletes,9–11 possibly since many of the ACL reconstructions in the registries are performed in recreational athletes with a lower activity level than competitive athletes. The revision rate in this study was about 6% after 10 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…High ACL graft failure rates for children and adolescents who return to sport (13% graft rupture after mean 6.5 years) have been reported in a systematic review and meta-analysis 10. In rugby players, the ACL graft failure was 16% after a 5-year follow-up period 11. The risk of ACL graft tear may be associated with the type of activity the athletes are engaged in 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventy-five studies were included in the systematic review for qualitative synthesis (figure 1), and 54 studies (9624 patients) were appropriate for quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). The reasons for excluding articles from meta-analysis were clinical diagnosis of meniscal tear only (10 studies35 50–58 and 1 additional study arm24), other ACL surgery than ACL reconstruction (4 studies)59–62 or both (2 studies) 63 64. We excluded studies if there was an unknown number of patients with new meniscal injuries (four studies) 65–68.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Yoshida et al showed that no significant correlations were observed between the SWE modulus and age <40 years in gastrocnemius muscle and tendon (Yoshida et al, ). Moreover, Takazawa et al reported a higher clinical risk of graft failure after ACL reconstruction in patients aged <20 years than in rugby players ≥20 years old (Takazawa et al, ). Herein, subjects who aged 20–39 years were investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACL reconstruction is usually successful, with satisfactory outcomes in 75%–97% of the patients (Samitier et al, ). Moreover, patients are generally able to return to the preinjury level of their sports capabilities, even for contact sports, such as rugby, after ACL reconstruction using an autograft or allograft (Takazawa et al, ). However, ACL reconstruction still fails in some cases (Borchers et al, ; Shelbourne et al, ; Barrett et al, ; Bourke et al, ; Magnussen et al, ; Wasserstein et al, ), and persistent or recurrent instability is the most frequent reason for early revision ACL reconstruction (Shelbourne et al, ; Magnussen et al, ; Wasserstein et al, ; Samitier et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%