Inflammation and trauma lead to enhanced pain sensitivity (hyperalgesia), which is in part due to altered sensory processing in the spinal cord. The synaptic hypothesis of hyperalgesia, which postulates that hyperalgesia is induced by the activity-dependent long-term potentiation (LTP) in the spinal cord, has been challenged, because in previous studies of pain pathways, LTP was experimentally induced by nerve stimulation at high frequencies ( approximately 100 hertz). This does not, however, resemble the real low-frequency afferent barrage that occurs during inflammation. We identified a synaptic amplifier at the origin of an ascending pain pathway that is switched-on by low-level activity in nociceptive nerve fibers. This model integrates known signal transduction pathways of hyperalgesia without contradiction.

Inflammation, trauma, or nerve injury may cause enduring hyperalgesia, an enhanced sensitivity to painful stimuli. Neurons in lamina I of the spinal dorsal horn that express the neurokinin 1 receptor for substance P mediate this abnormal pain sensitivity by an unknown cellular mechanism. We report that in these, but not in other nociceptive lamina I cells, neurokinin 1 receptor-activated signal transduction pathways and activation of low-threshold (T-type) voltage-gated calcium channels synergistically facilitate activity- and calcium-dependent long-term potentiation at synapses from nociceptive nerve fibers. Thereby, memory traces of painful events are retained.

Multiple myeloma (MM) cells are characterized by high protein synthesis resulting in chronic endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, which is adaptively managed by the unfolded protein response. Inositolrequiring enzyme 1␣ (IRE1␣) is activated to splice X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) mRNA, thereby increasing XBP1s protein, which in turn regulates genes responsible for protein folding and degradation during the unfolded protein response. In this study, we examined whether IRE1␣- IntroductionTreatment for multiple myeloma (MM) has remarkably improved because of novel agents, such as bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide. [1][2][3] However, MM remains incurable, and nextgeneration novel agents are urgently needed. Because of high levels of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and adaptation by the unfolded protein response (UPR), targeting signaling by the UPR and blocking this key survival pathway represent a new therapeutic strategy. In mammalian cells, protein folding is proportionally fine-tuned to the metabolic state of the cell within its microenvironment. Extracellular insults, such as low nutrients, hypoxia, and multiple drugs, result in the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER, thereby causing ER stress and initiating the UPR. 4 The UPR in turn increases the biosynthetic capacity and decreases the biosynthetic burden of the ER, to maintain cellular homeostasis. However, when the stress cannot be compensated by the UPR, cellular apoptosis occurs. 5 The UPR consists of 3 branches of signaling pathways, which initiate from 3 ER transmembrane proteins: inositol-requiring enzyme 1␣ (IRE1␣), PKR-like ER kinase (PERK), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6). In the resting state, these proteins are associated with molecular chaperone BiP/GRP78 in the ER. However, when unfolded proteins accumulate in the ER, BiP/GRP78 dissociates from them, thereby inducing UPR signaling. 6 In the UPR, IRE1␣ is activated by oligomerization and autophosphorylation, resulting in activation of its endoribonuclease to cleave and initiate splicing of the X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) mRNA. A 26-nucleotide intron from XBP1 is removed by activated IRE1␣ endoribonuclease, resulting in a translational frame-shift to modify unspliced XBP1 (XBP1u: inactive) into spliced XBP1 (XBP1s: active). 7 XBP1 is a unique transcription factor that regulates genes responsible for ER-associated degradation (ERAD), such as EDEM, and those responsible for promoting protein folding, such as p58IPK and other ER chaperones. 8 Thus, IRE1␣-XBP1 pathway has a prosurvival role in the UPR. However, under conditions of prolonged and uncompensated stress, the UPR leads to cellular apoptosis, known as the terminal UPR. The proapoptotic transcription factor CHOP, also known as GADD153, is induced via PERK and ATF6 pathways. CHOP causes downregulation of BCL2, thereby leading to caspase-dependent apoptosis. 9 IRE1␣ also has a proapoptotic role: it binds TRAF2 and activates ASK1, which causes JNK activation, thereby leading to caspase-dependent apoptosis. 10 ...

No abstract