2015
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20151120-02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Return to Work After Diskogenic Fusion in Workers' Compensation Subjects

Abstract: Lumbar fusion for degenerative disk disease (DDD) is associated with variable clinical outcomes. Patients with workers' compensation claims often have worse fusion outcomes than the general population. Few studies have evaluated the risk factors for poor outcomes within this clinically distinct population. The goal of this study was to identify preoperative predictors of return to work status after fusion for DDD in a workers' compensation setting. The authors used International Classification of Diseases, Nin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Although we were unable to identify any previous studies demonstrating preoperative opioid use predicting delayed RTW in patients undergoing CTR, a similarly designed recent study in patients undergoing lumbar fusion found preoperative opioid use to predict delayed postoperative RTW. 2 Furthermore, our multivariate model suggests that these conditions may have an additive, exponential effect on delaying RTW. Interestingly, patients who were either out of duty or on modified duty took twice as long to return back to work compared with patients who were on full-duty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…31 Although we were unable to identify any previous studies demonstrating preoperative opioid use predicting delayed RTW in patients undergoing CTR, a similarly designed recent study in patients undergoing lumbar fusion found preoperative opioid use to predict delayed postoperative RTW. 2 Furthermore, our multivariate model suggests that these conditions may have an additive, exponential effect on delaying RTW. Interestingly, patients who were either out of duty or on modified duty took twice as long to return back to work compared with patients who were on full-duty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated similar associations between preoperative employment status and postoperative RTW. 2,4,34 Time away from work has a direct negative correlation with RTW. 28 Anderson et al have reported that patients who were working at the time of surgery were 10.5 times more likely to be working at follow-up after fusion surgery.…”
Section: Work-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,26,30 This disability results in an estimated $30 billion in direct medical costs due to back-related health care resource utilization 42,63 and up to $20 billion annually in indirect costs due to lost productivity. 2 A considerable number of patients require surgery for lumbar degenerative conditions to restore functional and work-related capacity. 1,17,62,67 Several prospective and randomized controlled trials have shown the efficacy of surgical treatment, 1,17,65,67 but other studies have demonstrated that up to 25% of patients experience minimal improvement in quality of life (QOL), 46,58,52 and up to 10% experience a major complication or require hospital readmission after surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistently with previous studies, we reported that WC patients tended to exhibit higher post-operative pain (RR = 1.79) and disability (RR = 1.38) as well as lower satisfaction after surgery (RR = 2.10) compared to NWC patients. WC patients demonstrated also a delayed RTW (RR = 1.68) with a significant socioeconomic burden on both work insurances and employers [ 49 ]. This latter data is particularly important when considering that the annual expenditure for treating LBP in the United States is greater than $100 billion, with lost wages and reduced productivity accounting for approximately two thirds of the amount [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%