Returns to physician human capital: Evidence from patients randomized to physician teams

Abstract

Physicians play a major role in determining the cost and quality of healthcare, yet estimates of these effects can be confounded by patient sorting. This paper considers a natural experiment where nearly 30,000 patients were randomly assigned to clinical teams from one of two academic institutions. One institution is among the top medical schools in the U.S., while the other institution is ranked lower in the distribution. Patients treated by the two programs have similar observable characteristics and have access to a single set of facilities and ancillary staff. Those treated by physicians from the higher-ranked institution have 10-25% less expensive stays than patients assigned to the lower-ranked institution. Health outcomes are not related to the physician team assignment. Cost differences are most pronounced for serious conditions, and they largely stem from diagnostic-testing rates: the lower-ranked program tends to order more tests and takes longer to order them. JEL Classifications: I12; J24The authors would like to thank

Technology Diffusion and Productivity Growth in Health Care

“…This is consistent with hospitals spending more if they are more rapid adopters of Factor B inputs, since the technologies typically entail billing more to Medicare. This is also consistent with Chandra and Staiger (2007), who find that hospitals specializing in surgical treatments can attain similar levels of outcomes to those specializing in medical treatments, albeit at higher costs, and with Doyle et al (2010) who find that patients treated by physicians from a lower ranked medical school attain similar outcomes but require more resources to do so.…”

The Evolution of Physician Practice Styles: Evidence from Cardiologist Migration

“…Consistent with this possibility, physicians practicing in the same local health care market often exhibit large and persistent “style” differences in their tendency to prescribe certain treatments and utilize medical resources (Phelps 2000, Grytten and Sørensen 2003, and Epstein and Nicholson 2009). These styles exist even when physicians have access to the same hospital facilities and ancillary staff and when the patients are randomized to physician teams (Doyle, Ewer, and Wagner 2010). If physicians agglomerate geographically based on individual-level factors that drive practice styles (e.g., physicians practicing close to where they were trained, or physicians in the same region accumulating similar experiences), physician-specific factors could drive practice style differences across regions.…”

Return to Treatment in the Formal Health Care Sector: Evidence from Tanzania

“…Several recent studies in the United States have exploited natural experiments to estimate the returns to various categories of health care net of these biases. This literature has examined the effects of hospital quality (John Geweke et al 2003; Thomas Buchmueller et al 2006), physician quality (Joseph Doyle, Steven Ewer, and Todd Wagner 2010), emergency care (Doyle 2012), and postnatal and postpartum care (Douglas Almond et al 2010; Almond and Doyle 2011). …”