Revealed by degrees: Patients’ experience of receiving information after in‐hospital cardiac arrest

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe patients’ experience of receiving information about the event after having a cardiac arrest in hospital. Background In Sweden, approximately 2,600 people per year experience cardiac arrest in hospital. After a cardiac arrest, the patient is entitled to receive information about what has occurred. This information must be provided in a way that does not do the patient more harm than good. In order to provide information to patients in a satisfactory manner for them, knowledge about how patients react to information in this situation is valuable. Design We used a qualitative approach with interviews and content analysis. Methods Twenty patients participated in face‐to‐face interviews analysed by content analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies were used. Results The analysis resulted in three categories: Getting the information gradually, Understanding information received and Seeking clarity. The subcategories that emerged were as follows: Indirect information, Short and direct information, Explanatory information, Lack of information, Unsatisfactory information, Hard‐to‐understand information, Insight, Unanswered questions, Hard‐to‐formulate questions, Requesting information and Searching independently for knowledge. Conclusions The patients needed gradual and repeated information during their hospitalisation, and repeated information was continually required after their discharge from hospital. Whether or how the information was given varied. The patients’ experience was that they sometimes lacked opportunities for conversation and asking questions, while they also found it hard to formulate questions. Patients who have a cardiac arrest in hospital appear to have similar information needs to patients whose cardiac arrest takes place outside the hospital context. Relevance to clinical practice Information on the patient's cardiac arrest should be given in gradual stages, according to the patient's needs. The information needs to be repeated during the hospital stay and after discharge. Healthcare professional should gain insight into patients’ responses and create information that is adapted to the individual.

What the curtains do not shield: A phenomenological exploration of patient‐witnessed resuscitation in hospital. Part 1: patients' experiences

“…Participants in our study highlighted the benefit of receiving information about the resuscitation event. This is important as well‐informed patients are likely to be more satisfied with the care they receive, less anxious and have a more positive hospital experience (Klint et al, 2019 ). Participants wanted to know the condition and the prognosis of the patient after resuscitation and felt frustrated when could not have this information.…”

Getting better or getting by?: A qualitative study of in-hospital cardiac arrest survivors long-term recovery experiences

“…Information both during hospitalization and after discharge may be crucial given that information has a, “direct influence on the level of control [patients feel],” and has the potential to decrease negative emotions ( Cartledge et al, 2018 , p. 1163). Additionally, as Klint et al (2019) found, information needs to be given in stages and repeated throughout the course of recovery including after discharge. Although several years had passed, participants still expressed a need for information confirming that repeated and ongoing education is important in the recovery process.…”

Family attendance during critical illness episodes: Reflection on practices in Arabic and Muslim contexts

“…A review of studies that explored the perspectives of staff in critical care units and departments found that staff were not in favor of family presence during the care of severely ill or injured patients. 27 This contradicted the family members' wishes noted in previous studies. Another study conducted in Singapore revealed that most (73%) family members preferred being present with the patient and believed it would facilitate their grief.…”

“…A review of studies that explored the perspectives of staff in critical care units and departments found that staff were not in favor of family presence during the care of severely ill or injured patients 27 . This contradicted the family members' wishes noted in previous studies.…”