2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealing deposition mechanism of colloid particles on human serum albumin monolayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of its significance, nanoparticle and microparticle adsorption kinetics was extensively studied by a variety of experimental techniques such as optical microscopy, 22 atomic force microscopy (AFM), 23 25 scanning electron microscopy (SEM), 25 28 ellipsometry, 29 31 reflectometry, 32 , 33 surface plasmon resonance, 34 and electrokinetic methods. 35 , 36 However, these techniques cannot provide valid information about the adhesive contact strength between the particles and the substrate surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of its significance, nanoparticle and microparticle adsorption kinetics was extensively studied by a variety of experimental techniques such as optical microscopy, 22 atomic force microscopy (AFM), 23 25 scanning electron microscopy (SEM), 25 28 ellipsometry, 29 31 reflectometry, 32 , 33 surface plasmon resonance, 34 and electrokinetic methods. 35 , 36 However, these techniques cannot provide valid information about the adhesive contact strength between the particles and the substrate surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its significance, nanoparticle and microparticle adsorption kinetics was extensively studied by a variety of experimental techniques such as optical microscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), ellipsometry, reflectometry, , surface plasmon resonance, and electrokinetic methods. , However, these techniques cannot provide valid information about the adhesive contact strength between the particles and the substrate surfaces. In this respect, the quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) method exhibits pronounced advantages, enabling precise, in situ deposition/desorption kinetic measurements for the nano- and microparticles under flow conditions. However, these investigations were almost exclusively focused on spherical particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nanoparticle and microparticle deposition kinetics was extensively studied by various experimental techniques comprising optical microscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM), , scanning electron microscopy (SEM), , ellipsometry, reflectometry, , and the quartz crystal microbalance (QCM). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adamczyk et al 22 demonstrated the influence of flow intensity on adsorption kinetics of polystyrene latex particles and more recently they have determined in situ the coverage of colloids particles directly adsorbed in the streaming potential cell under diffusion conditions. [23][24][25] Semmler et al 26 compared the radial distribution functions with theoretical calculations performed according to the random sequential modeling considering the polydispersity of a latex suspension. Hosseini et al 27 have recently studied the effect of electrostatic field on the aggregation rate and aggregate size of asphaltene particles using a horizontally oriented glass micromodel, with a pair of opposing electrodes inserted within the model and a microscopic camera.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%