“…Identity work is always constrained, always over‐determined, by what is discursively available in a particular context. Individuals are not passive (Atewologun, Sealy and Vinnicombe, ), they exhibit agency in negotiating their identities (Wright, Nyberg and Grant, ) albeit ‘act[ing] within socially constructed ranges of possibilities’ (Calhoun, , p. 144, cited in Srinivas, ), some discourses may be more powerful and/or legitimate than others and some social identities less amenable to adaptation. Religious social identities are influential, providing identity claims that believers ‘constantly validate by their social behaviour, to the approval of their co‐religionists and the hostility or apathy of others’ (Herriot and Scott‐Jackson, , p. 252).…”