2000
DOI: 10.1017/s1074070800027875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revenue Insurance for Georgia and South Carolina Peaches

Abstract: We estimate actuarially fair premium rates for yield and revenue insurance for Georgia and South Carolina peaches. The premium rates for both products decrease at a decreasing rate as the mean farm-level yield increases. In general, the premium rate for revenue insurance exceeds the premium rate for yield insurance for a given coverage level and expected yield. Although the revenue and yield insurance rates differ in a statistical sense, they do not appear to differ in an economic sense except at high coverage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It also incorporates the correlation of production aid, whose magnitude varies with each EU member state total production, and farmers' yields. This allows for detailed policy comparisons at a very disaggregate level, and it also relaxes restrictive assumptions commonly found in the literature, that could affect the reliability of the premiums calculated on the basis of such suppositions (Hennessy et al, 1997;Calkins et al, 1997;Miller et al, 2000).…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It also incorporates the correlation of production aid, whose magnitude varies with each EU member state total production, and farmers' yields. This allows for detailed policy comparisons at a very disaggregate level, and it also relaxes restrictive assumptions commonly found in the literature, that could affect the reliability of the premiums calculated on the basis of such suppositions (Hennessy et al, 1997;Calkins et al, 1997;Miller et al, 2000).…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This indicates that revenue insurance has some properties that can be assimilated to the use of derivative markets, although it could constitute a more efficient tool for risk reduction by also protecting against drops in yields. Miller et al (2000) find no clear advantages of revenue insurance over yield insurance in the case of peach growers because of the low correlation between yields and prices. Stokes et al (1997) show that insuring for the whole farm's revenues is more efficient than insuring each crop by a different revenue insurance policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, Miller et al, (2000) no hallan ventajas claras en un seguro de ingresos ofrecido al sector melocotonero en EEUU, debido a la escasa correlación entre rendimientos y precios.…”
Section: Un Breve Balance Sobre Las Experiencias De Seguros De Ingresosunclassified