1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1990.tb14655.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversal of the anorectic effect of (+)‐fenfluramine in the rat by the selective cholecystokinin receptor antagonist MK‐329

Abstract: 1 Experiments were conducted to determine whether or not the effect of (+)-fenfluramine (3.0mgkg-, i.p.) on food intake can be antagonized by the selective cholecystokinin receptor antagonist MK-239 (formerly L364,718; (3S(-)-N42,3-dihydro-1-methyl-2-oxo-5-phenyl-1-H-1,4-benzodiazepin-3-yl)-1H-indole-2-carboxamide). Two feeding paradigms were employed. In the first, non-deprived rats were familiarized with eating a highly palatable, sweetened mash in a 30min test. In the second, freely-feeding rats were traine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method of Cooper et al (1990) was used. Animals were allowed free access to food and they were given a palatable diet daily.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of Cooper et al (1990) was used. Animals were allowed free access to food and they were given a palatable diet daily.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooper et al [230] took the opposite approach and investigated if 5-HT induced satiety would require CCK activity. They and others [231] demonstrated that the CCK1-receptor antagonist devazepide blocked the satiating effect of systemic 5-HT or fenfluramine, whereas the CCK2-recptor antagonist L-365.260 was ineffective.…”
Section: -Ht Interactions With Cck and Leptinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it was reported that L-364,718 enhanced hunger ratings in humans (14). Despite the large body of evidence in support of endogenous CCK as a physiologic mediator of food intake, there are a considerable number of studies that have failed to detect a significant increase in feeding after L-364,718 administration (3,7,8,15,16). The physiologic variables and/or subtle differences in the feeding paradigms, which explain the discrepant findings with this CCK-AR-specific antagonist are currently unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%