2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4941572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reverse degradation of nickel graphene junction by hydrogen annealing

Abstract: Metal contacts are fundamental building components for graphene based electronic devices and their properties are greatly influenced by interface quality during device fabrication, leading to resistance variation. Here we show that nickel graphene junction degrades after air exposure, due to interfacial oxidation, thus creating a tunneling barrier. Most importantly, we demonstrate that hydrogen annealing at moderate temperature (300 0C) is an effective technique to reverse the degradation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, Zhang et al hint at the long-term degradation of contact resistance after exposure to air which can be reversed by hydrogen annealing in case of nickel graphene contacts. 34 The steep slope, that is, the abnormal sheet resistance, of device 4 indicates possible defects or contamination of the graphene sheet. Therefore, this device was not considered in the averaging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Also, Zhang et al hint at the long-term degradation of contact resistance after exposure to air which can be reversed by hydrogen annealing in case of nickel graphene contacts. 34 The steep slope, that is, the abnormal sheet resistance, of device 4 indicates possible defects or contamination of the graphene sheet. Therefore, this device was not considered in the averaging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our values of the sheet resistance are in line with previous literature studying graphene on SiO 2 . , Our measured contact resistances are 1.6 to 2.4 times higher than previously reported values by Passi et al and Russo et al for devices without additional treatment to reduce their contact resistance (1518 and 800 Ω μm, respectively). , This discrepancy might be due to a difference in contact design because we place the graphene on top of the metallization rather than below, as in those cases. Also, Zhang et al hint at the long-term degradation of contact resistance after exposure to air which can be reversed by hydrogen annealing in case of nickel graphene contacts . The steep slope, that is, the abnormal sheet resistance, of device 4 indicates possible defects or contamination of the graphene sheet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations