2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44604-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reverse Micellar Extraction for Downstream Processing of Proteins/Enzymes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 282 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As observed for lipases in organic waterfree solvents (Sharma et al, 2001), this hydrophobic environment could favor the transesterification process, thereby leading to the synthesis of high molecular mass polyesters. These lipase-catalyzed esterifications are well documented for both the synthesis of small esters and the synthesis of high-M r polyesters (Wescott and Klibanov, 1994;Krishna et al, 2002;Kobayashi, 2010). These studies have clearly shown that the lipase-catalyzed esterification can involve both primary and secondary alcohol groups, depending on the source of lipase and environmental conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Discussion Slcus1 Catalysis Impacts the Ester Cross-linking mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As observed for lipases in organic waterfree solvents (Sharma et al, 2001), this hydrophobic environment could favor the transesterification process, thereby leading to the synthesis of high molecular mass polyesters. These lipase-catalyzed esterifications are well documented for both the synthesis of small esters and the synthesis of high-M r polyesters (Wescott and Klibanov, 1994;Krishna et al, 2002;Kobayashi, 2010). These studies have clearly shown that the lipase-catalyzed esterification can involve both primary and secondary alcohol groups, depending on the source of lipase and environmental conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Discussion Slcus1 Catalysis Impacts the Ester Cross-linking mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, increasing the AOT concentration from 80.0-200.0 g/L has significantly lowered the percentage of solubilized erythromycin from 95.87 % to 41.65 % with a slight precipitation observed at the interface of the solution. As clarified by Harikrishna et al, 15 at high surfactant concentration, the extraction yield would become lower because of intermicellar collision and hindrance to the diffusion of solute by surfactant aggregates. Meanwhile, Juang et al 16 appointed that the biomolecule solubilization will increase in conjunction to higher surfactant concentration because of the increment in the size of the micelle.…”
Section: Effect Of the Aot Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Considering the evidence from this study, it has been confirmed that reverse micelles extraction is controlled by electrostatic, steric and hydrophobic interactions between the bio-molecules and micelles. 15 The reduction of interactions in the repulsive head group occurring at the surface resulted in larger sized micelles than in either of the pure component micelles, hence the CMC value of the mixture is also lesser. The resulted aqueous solution after the solubilization of erythromycin was observed to be a clear solutionwith a transparent interface when the concentration of AOT varied from 20-140 g/L, thereby indicative of the successful solubilization of erythromycin in the reverse micelle phase.…”
Section: Effect Of the Aot Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 The extraction process could be effectively used as a primary separation/purification step. 5 In most cases it is considered that the driving force for the mass transfer of biomolecules is electrostatic interaction between the protein and the charged surfactant head groups. However, other interactions such as hydrophobic interaction between protein and surfactant, have been demonstrated for the solubilization mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%