2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-020-9959-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible hydrogenation restores defected graphene to graphene

Abstract: Graphene as a two-dimensional material is prone to hydrocarbon contaminations, which can significantly alter its intrinsic electrical properties. Herein, we implement a facile hydrogenation-dehydrogenation strategy to remove hydrocarbon contaminations and preserve the excellent transport properties of monolayer graphene. Using electron microscopy we quantitatively characterized the improved cleanness of hydrogenated graphene compared to untreated samples. In situ spectroscopic investigations revealed that the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon can be attributed to the p ‐type doping effect due to the adsorbed water [ 4 ] as well as the air bone hydrocarbon contaminations. [ 57 ] A correlation between the observed effect and the Raman spectroscopy results is discussed in Section S6, Supporting Information. While the Dirac point shifts to higher gate voltages, the asymmetry in electron and hole conductivity becomes more pronounced.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This phenomenon can be attributed to the p ‐type doping effect due to the adsorbed water [ 4 ] as well as the air bone hydrocarbon contaminations. [ 57 ] A correlation between the observed effect and the Raman spectroscopy results is discussed in Section S6, Supporting Information. While the Dirac point shifts to higher gate voltages, the asymmetry in electron and hole conductivity becomes more pronounced.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Notably, a clean and uniform surface of graphene is also important to form a compact and high quality heterojunction. [ 71,72 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphene/PTCDA/pentacene 1 ×10 5 400-700 [19] Graphene/perovskite (CH 3 NH 3 PBI 3 ) 1.8 × 10 2 400-800 [13] Graphene/SWNTs 1.0 × 10 2 400-1550 [57] Graphene/C 8 -BTBT 1.0 ×10 4 355 [58] SWNTs/C 60 2.0 × 10 2 1000-1400 [59] Graphene/P3HT 1.0 × 10 5 500 [9] Graphene/P3HT/perovskite (CH 3 NH 3 PBI 3−x Cl x ) 4.3 × 10 9 400-800 [20] Graphene/chlorophyll 1.0 × 10 6 400-700 [60] Graphene/rubrene 1.0 × 10 7 400-600 [7] Graphene/WS 2 1.0 × 10 6 400-700 [8] Graphene/PbS QDS 1.0 × 10 7 600-1000 [61] MoS 2 /g-C 3 N 4 4.0 × 10 0 270 [62] Graphene/C 60 1.1 × 10 2 405-1550 [63] Graphene/C 60 /pentacene 9.1 × 10 2 405-1550 [22] Graphene/C 60 /graphene (vertical) 3.4 × 10 5 405-1550 [64] Graphene/C 60 /graphene (planar) 5.5 × 10 3 360-658 [65] Graphene/C 60 /PbPc 2.2 × 10 3 405-980 This work and uniform surface of graphene is also important to form a compact and high quality heterojunction. [71,72] Moreover, graphene/C 60 /PbPc/Au phototransistor was fabricated and referred to as device D to evaluate the impact of the position of the C 60 acceptor layer within the three-layer planar heterojunction (Figure S5c, Supporting Information). [1,2] The difference between device A and device D is the position of source and drain electrodes (Au) within the heterojunction.…”
Section: Active Materials Responsivitymentioning
confidence: 99%