2008
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/47/475504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible mechanical actuation of elastomeric nanopores

Abstract: Mechanical resizing of individual nanopores in a thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer has been characterized. Specimen nanopores were conical, with smaller hole dimensions of the order of tens to hundreds of nanometres. Electrophoretic current measurements show that the estimated nanopore radius can be reversibly actuated over an order of magnitude by stretching and relaxing the elastomer. Within a working range of stretching, current is proportional to specimen extension to the power of a constant, n, which r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
83
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applied pressure was À 372 6 20 Pa, and pore openings can be imaged using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), 30,[32][33][34][35] with specimens similar to the type used (classified NP1000 by Izon Science) having typical opening radii of 2.6 and 19.7 lm when the specimen arm length is extended to 45 mm. 73 A constriction below the pore surface is suggested by the membrane topography imaged by atomic force microscopy, 32 and this is not inconsistent with confocal microscopy 33 and SEM. 35 Closer comparison of fitted and experimental parameters would need to incorporate uncertainty in two further values, the electrolyte resistivity (q ¼ 0.75 X m) which is assumed homogeneous, and the membrane thickness (d ¼ 159 lm), which is obtained using a hyperelastic material model of pore actuation.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Applied pressure was À 372 6 20 Pa, and pore openings can be imaged using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), 30,[32][33][34][35] with specimens similar to the type used (classified NP1000 by Izon Science) having typical opening radii of 2.6 and 19.7 lm when the specimen arm length is extended to 45 mm. 73 A constriction below the pore surface is suggested by the membrane topography imaged by atomic force microscopy, 32 and this is not inconsistent with confocal microscopy 33 and SEM. 35 Closer comparison of fitted and experimental parameters would need to incorporate uncertainty in two further values, the electrolyte resistivity (q ¼ 0.75 X m) which is assumed homogeneous, and the membrane thickness (d ¼ 159 lm), which is obtained using a hyperelastic material model of pore actuation.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sophistication of resistive pulse sensing has also increased, making use of channels made from carbon nanotubes, 17,18 glass, [19][20][21][22][23] silicon, 5,8,15,24 polymers, [25][26][27][28] and elastomers. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Resistive pulses can now be used for study and measurement of particle size, 2,3,17,18,20,21,34 concentration, 33 and charge. 17,38 There is clear potential to extend applications towards sensing of complicated dynamic interactions 24 and specific particle shapes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TRPS is an adaptation of RPS in which utilises a conical tunable elastomeric pore that can be stretched or relaxed to change the pore size to suit the sample [11,13,[15][16][17][18][19]. Tunable pore membranes are made of thermoplastic polyurethane and the pores are introduced by mechanical puncture.…”
Section: Tunable Resistive Pulse Sensing (Trps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membrane can be stretched in a biaxial direction to alter the pore size. The size of the pore can be altered as much as an order of magnitude [17].…”
Section: Tunable Resistive Pulse Sensing (Trps)mentioning
confidence: 99%