2019
DOI: 10.21615/cesp.12.1.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revertir la memoria del conflicto armado colombiano, análisis del discurso en la prensa escrita

Abstract: Este artículo presenta los resultados de una investigación sobre los procesos de reversión de memorias del conflicto armado colombiano publicados en la prensa escrita. Se adopta la noción de memoria revertida como dispositivo narrativo mediante el que se relatan acontecimientos del pasado a partir de la cobertura de eventos actuales con valor noticioso en los medios de comunicación. Se empleó el método de Análisis del Discurso sobre notas de prensa referidas a los procesos de reparación a víctimas del conflict… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By establishing a unique and hegemonic recount that accounts for the entire memory of the conflict. Explanatory premises are set to circulate, in which winners and losers are constructed, the good and the evil, who make up the truth about the conflict (Castillejo, 2017; Londoño et al, 2019). The Colombian government, eager to have an official memory that synthesizes the conflict’s history via their laws, has deepened the social distance within the victims and the civil society.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By establishing a unique and hegemonic recount that accounts for the entire memory of the conflict. Explanatory premises are set to circulate, in which winners and losers are constructed, the good and the evil, who make up the truth about the conflict (Castillejo, 2017; Londoño et al, 2019). The Colombian government, eager to have an official memory that synthesizes the conflict’s history via their laws, has deepened the social distance within the victims and the civil society.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%