2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2022.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review and status of tool tip frequency response function prediction using receptance coupling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The connection of an actual tool can be straightforwardly carried out using equation (1). In this case, the matrix 𝐻 (M,N<4) is assembled based on the FEM of the tool being connected.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulation Of Inverse Rcsamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The connection of an actual tool can be straightforwardly carried out using equation (1). In this case, the matrix 𝐻 (M,N<4) is assembled based on the FEM of the tool being connected.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulation Of Inverse Rcsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The receptance coupling methods offer a solution how to take into account the change of the tool. As many researchers have contributed to enhancing the applications of receptance coupling techniques, a detailed review is presented in [1] by Schmitz et al Receptance coupling methods combine the measured dynamic attributes of the machine structure (without a tool) with the simulated dynamics of different tools. These substructure dynamics are represented by frequency response functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the condition of joint deformation is entered only for the 1st and 2nd subsystems, and dependencies (36) and (38) are represented in the forms:…”
Section: •Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the approach characterized by the receiving communication substructure analysis (RCSA) method. This method was first applied by Schmitz and colleagues to predict tool tip susceptibility during milling using a frequency response function (FRF) [38]. They established the main advantages of the RCSA method [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquisition of a tooltip frequency response function (FRF) in micro-milling plays an important role in establishing accurate and reliable stability lobule diagrams (SLD). Experimental modal analysis (EMA) is the most used method for tool FRF determination [ 12 ]. Experimental modal analysis technology combines theoretical analysis with dynamic testing through system identification theory and modal analysis theory, which generally has three basic links: excitation, measurement, and analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%