2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of artificial neural networks for gasoline, diesel and homogeneous charge compression ignition engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From the result it is revealed that the COF of GFRPA66 with 35 wt.% is low as compared with GFRPA66 with 30 wt.% reinforcements, since it has better transfer layer formation, increased adhesion of PA66, and low abrasion by glass fiber with less temperature between the contact surfaces. Also the elastic modulus and ultimate strength of glass fiber improve as the weight of glass fiber increases [ 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the result it is revealed that the COF of GFRPA66 with 35 wt.% is low as compared with GFRPA66 with 30 wt.% reinforcements, since it has better transfer layer formation, increased adhesion of PA66, and low abrasion by glass fiber with less temperature between the contact surfaces. Also the elastic modulus and ultimate strength of glass fiber improve as the weight of glass fiber increases [ 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 6, mesh-independence analysis was used to optimize the mesh size. The mesh size was adjusted when further meshing did not affect the simulated data [52][53][54][55][56]. Two million cells were chosen because there was no additional enhancement in the solution after such count, based on consistent with the experimental information.…”
Section: Methodology Of Cfd Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since GP and SVM-Schotastic model performed the best among the other models for FS and CS for this dataset, sensitivity analysis was carried out on it by changing the input combination and taking out one input parameter at a time, as shown in Table 9 and Table 10 . Statistical assessment metrics such as CC, MAE, and RMSE were used to assess each model’s performance [ 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 ]. Table 9 and Table 10 , demonstrates that the number of curing days followed by CA, C, w and MP is critical in predicting the flexural and compressive strength of a concrete mix.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%