2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2020.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of built heritage modelling: Integration of HBIM and other information techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
1
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As HBIM practical cases show, the initial study of the historical contextualization of the building, the study of materials and analysis of construction processes are important. The importance of the methodology of information collection, standardization, construction techniques, the use of scanners, virtual reality and photogrammetry is reported in our study and has already been reported in previous reviews up to 2019 [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] and 2020 [39]. Studies focusing on linked open data (LOD) [40], digital documentation of heritage buildings [37] and performance assessment in HBIM [41] remain areas of interest.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…As HBIM practical cases show, the initial study of the historical contextualization of the building, the study of materials and analysis of construction processes are important. The importance of the methodology of information collection, standardization, construction techniques, the use of scanners, virtual reality and photogrammetry is reported in our study and has already been reported in previous reviews up to 2019 [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] and 2020 [39]. Studies focusing on linked open data (LOD) [40], digital documentation of heritage buildings [37] and performance assessment in HBIM [41] remain areas of interest.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…In this sense, the HBIM methodology offers an excellent support tool for the management of built heritage (Brumana, Georgopoulos, Oreni, Raimondi, & Bregianni, 2013;García-Valldecabres, Pellicer, & Jordan-Palomar, 2016;Brumana, Oreni, Raimondi, Georgopoulos, & Bregianni, 2016;García, García-Valldecabres, & Blasco, 2018;Bruno & Roncella, 2019). Despite the still substantial limitations in the modelling of complex structures or decorative apparatuses, to which a solution can be found thanks to external modelling software and the use of NURBS (Oreni et al, 2014;Brumana et al, 2018;Diara & Rinaudo, 2020), the ease of data management and its visualisation and the simplicity of updating, provides a reason why this methodology is increasingly used (Logothetis, Delinasiou, & Stylianidis, 2015;Yang et al, 2020). Starting from a complete photogrammetric survey of the whole complex, integrated with laser scans, 21 chapels have been modelled with BIM methodology (green).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photogrammetric techniques rely on images taken from different viewpoints to record the 3D geometry of a building or objects (Dore and Murphy, 2017). As these techniques are quick and easy to use, and the costs of devices are relatively low (Altman et al, 2017;Brilakis et al, 2010;Dobelis et al, 2016;Ulvi, 2021;Yang et al, 2020), the recording of existing buildings by photogrammetry has increased recently (Dore and Murphy, 2017;Yang et al, 2020). Even though photogrammetry has several advantages compared to laser scanning, including high-quality imagery and colour information (Dore and Murphy, 2017), there are also multiple challenges related to this technique.…”
Section: Photogrammetrymentioning
confidence: 99%