Review of Evidence‐Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction

Carlson, Nicole S.; Ellis, Jessica; Page, Katie; Amore, Alexis Dunn; Phillippi, Julia C.

doi:10.1111/jmwh.13238

Cited by 18 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 82 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nowadays, double balloon catheter (DBC) and dinoprostone as two useful methods for induction of labor in pregnant women at term have been widely used in clinical practice [16][17][18]. In our trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of DBC and dinoprostone as labor-inducing agents just in multipara at term.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone for labor induction in multipara at term

Yuan

Peng

Yang

et al. 2023

Arch Gynecol Obstet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The aim of this study was to comparatively assess the efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter (DBC) and dinoprostone as labor-inducing agents just for multipara at term. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted among multipara at term with a Bishop score < 6 who needed planned labor induction from January 1, 2020, to December 30, 2020 in Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei province, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. They were divided into DBC group and dinoprostone group, respectively. Baseline maternal data, maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded for statistical analysis. Total vaginal delivery rate, rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h, rate of uterine hyperstimulation combined with abnormal fetal heart rate(FHR) were regarded as the primary outcome variables. The difference between groups was considered statistically significant when p value < 0.05. Results A total of 202 multiparas was included for analysis (95 women in DBC group vs 107 women in dinoprostone group). There were no significant differences in total vaginal delivery rate and rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h between groups. Uterine hyperstimulation combined with abnormal FHR occurred exclusively in dinoprostone group. Conclusion DBC and dinoprostone seem to be equally effective, while, DBC seems to be safer than dinoprostone.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone for labor induction in multipara at term

Yuan

Peng

Yang

et al. 2023

Arch Gynecol Obstet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nowadays, double balloon catheter(DBC) and dinoprostone as two useful methods for induction of labor in pregnant women at term have been widely used in clinical practice [16][17][18] . In our trial, we compared the e cacy and safety of DBC and dinoprostone as labor-inducing agents just in multipara at term.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone for labor induction in multipara at term

Yuan

Peng²,

Yang³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The aim of this study was to comparatively assess the efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter (DBC) and dinoprostone as labor-inducing agents just for multipara at term. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted among multipara at term with a Bishop score < 6 who needed planned labor induction from January 1, 2020, to December 30, 2020 in Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei province, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. They were divided into DBC group and dinoprostone group respectively. Baseline maternal data, maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded for statistical analysis. Total vaginal delivery rate, rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h, rate of uterine hyperstimulation combined with abnormal fetal heart rate(FHR) were regarded as the primary outcome variables. The diffrerence between groups was considered statistically significant when p value < 0.05. Results A total of 202 multipara was included for analysis (95 women in DBC group vs 107 women in dinoprostone group). There were no significant differences in total vaginal delivery rate and rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h between groups. Uterine hyperstimulation combined with abnormal FHR occurred exclusively in dinoprostone group. Conclusion DBC and dinoprostone seem to be equally effective, and DBC seems to be safer than dinoprostone as it causes lower rate of uterine hyperstimulation combined with abnormal FHR.

show abstract

“…This increase has been driven by the increasing prevalence of medical complications during pregnancy leading to elective IOL prior to 42 weeks of gestation. 1 Studies which investigated repeated cycle of induction have been inconsistent in finding a common ground and defining clear guidelines for how to reduce failure of IOL. NICE guidelines 2 recommend that if IOL fails, a decision about further management should be made in accordance with the mother's wishes and clinical circumstances: NICE 2 recommends offering a rest period, a further attempt to induce, or a C-section.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Success rate of repeated cycles of induction in labour in a UK clinical setting: A cohort study

Alojayli

Haloob

2023

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Births are increasingly started artificially using medications such as prostaglandin, oxytocin, or other mechanical methods, a process known as induction of labour (IOL). The aim of the study was to identify the success rate of a repeat cycle of induction of labour (IOL) with prostaglandins, and any association between smoking and patient response to prostaglandin. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study set in Basildon and Thurrock University Hospital, UK. IOL data from patients were collected between 1 January 2021 and 30 March 2021. Data were retrieved from hospital records and categorised by prostaglandin cycle(s), administration of oxytocin, artificial rupture of membranes (ARM), spontaneous rupture of membranes (SROM), smoking status, patient BMI, age, ethnicity, gestation age, Bishop score, and delivery method (assisted, unassisted, or Caesarean (C-)section). The data were analysed using Chi-square, binomial and multinomial logistic regression. The success rate was interpreted from relative frequencies of delivery method (unassisted, assisted or C-section). Results: Unassisted vaginal delivery (n =121; 48.0%) was the most common outcome with prostaglandin IOL followed by C-section (n = 105 41.7%). Only 10.3% had an assisted vaginal delivery. Of those who had a repeated IOL cycle, 85.7% had a C-section. There was no difference in prostaglandin administration by smoking status or any association between smoking status and mode of delivery in IOL. Conclusions: Repeat cycle of IOL does not enhance the vaginal delivery with only 14.3% unassisted vaginal births. There was no evidence that smoking impacted on response to prostaglandins or method of delivery.

show abstract

Review of Evidence‐Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction

Cited by 18 publications

References 82 publications

Efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone for labor induction in multipara at term

Efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone for labor induction in multipara at term

Efficacy and safety of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone for labor induction in multipara at term

Success rate of repeated cycles of induction in labour in a UK clinical setting: A cohort study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About