2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of experimental techniques for high rate deformation and shock studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
328
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 662 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 248 publications
(245 reference statements)
3
328
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For the offset contact models, the identified results are presented in Figure 10. It can be seen that the identification is significantly worse than that for contact model (1). For the same specimen, the identified Young's modulus from the top and bottom surfaces converges at the left part of the specimen.…”
Section: Over-determined System Solution From Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the offset contact models, the identified results are presented in Figure 10. It can be seen that the identification is significantly worse than that for contact model (1). For the same specimen, the identified Young's modulus from the top and bottom surfaces converges at the left part of the specimen.…”
Section: Over-determined System Solution From Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Over the years, different strategies for characterising the mechanical behaviour of materials at high strain rates have been developed in the scientific community. A review of the main experimental techniques for high rate tests is available in [1]. Among these techniques the most popular is the so-called the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) or Kolsky bar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this kind of device, strain rates up to 10 3 s −1 can typically be obtained [19]. A review of the use of SHPB can be found in [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(b-e), showing the indenter impacting the surface and the generation of a crater. Strain rate estimations of these impacts, assuming an initial contact diameter of 0.2 mm on impact, indicate that a falling speed of 3.13 ms -1 can give a peak strain rate along the surface of >10 4 s -1 , which is around the upper boundary for Hopkinson bar tests [14]. The total kinetic energy (KE) applied on contact is calculated at 2.94 J.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%