2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists

Abstract: ObjectivesMany chronic eye conditions are managed within public hospital ophthalmology clinics resulting in encumbered wait lists. Integrated care schemes can increase system capacity. In order to direct implementation of a public hospital-based integrated eye care model, this study aims to evaluate the quality of referrals for new patients through information content, assess triage decisions of newly referred patients and evaluate the consistency of referral content for new patients referred multiple times.De… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, some dental and ophthalmologic specialties are often available from hospitals and are mainly provided by specialised health professionals. However, the literature suggests that some patients are improperly referred, consuming health-care resources that could have been used elsewhere, and that some patients are inappropriately treated in primary care settings when they should have received specialist care [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. The costs associated with inappropriate referrals to secondary care are unnecessary, notwithstanding the effects on waiting lists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, some dental and ophthalmologic specialties are often available from hospitals and are mainly provided by specialised health professionals. However, the literature suggests that some patients are improperly referred, consuming health-care resources that could have been used elsewhere, and that some patients are inappropriately treated in primary care settings when they should have received specialist care [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. The costs associated with inappropriate referrals to secondary care are unnecessary, notwithstanding the effects on waiting lists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%