2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of regulatory reference values and background levels for heavy metals in the human diet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This Cd toxicity threshold level was derived from a risk assessment model that assumes β 2 M excretion above ≥300 µg/g creatinine as an endpoint [ 10 . 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This Cd toxicity threshold level was derived from a risk assessment model that assumes β 2 M excretion above ≥300 µg/g creatinine as an endpoint [ 10 . 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cd has been shown to cause a reduction in the tubular maximum reabsorption of β 2 M [ 9 ], and increased β 2 M excretion has been used as an indicator of impaired tubular reabsorptive function for many decades. An increase in the excretion of β 2 M above 300 μg/g creatinine is used as an endpoint in health risk assessments of Cd in the human diet, and urinary Cd excretion levels below 5.24 µg Cd/g creatinine have been identified as body burdens that are not associated with such an increase in β 2 M excretion [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. However, our previous assessment showed that β 2 M excretion of 100–299, 300–999 and ≥ 1000 μg/g creatinine were associated with 4.7-, 6.2- and 10.5-fold increases in the risk of an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , which is commensurate with chronic kidney disease (CKD) [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To safeguard against excessive dietary Cd exposure, health guidance such as a tolerable intake level of Cd was established [ 7 ]. The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants (JECFA) considered the kidney to be the critical target of Cd toxicity [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we argue that a reduction in eGFR due to Cd nephropathy could serve as the POD from which health guidance values should be derived. Owing to some shortcomings of the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL), the benchmark dose (BMD) has been used as the POD [ 7 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. The BMD is a dose level, derived from an estimated dose–response curve, associated with a specified change in response, termed benchmark response (BMR) which can be set at 1%, 5%, or 10% as required [ 14 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2010, the Joint Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and World Health Organisation (WHO) Expert Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants (JECFA) deemed the kidneys to be a suitable target for evaluating cadmium toxicity, as measurements of ß 2 -microglobulin could be used as a surrogate biomarker for the effects of dietary cadmium intake [ 148 ]. The JECFA established a tolerable monthly intake of 25 µg/kg/bodyweight per month, with a urinary cadmium excretion rate of 5.24 µg/g creatinine or 0.8 µg/kg/day as a nephrotoxicity threshold [ 148 , 149 , 150 ]. While the EFSA and JECFA share the same critical ß 2 -microglobulin endpoint of 300 µg/g creatinine, the EFSA adopted a different cadmium excretion rate of 1 µg/g creatinine as the nephrotoxicity threshold, along with an uncertainty factor of 0.36 µg/kg bodyweight per day for 50 years as a benchmark dose [ 151 ].…”
Section: Cadmium and Human Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%