2012
DOI: 10.1038/jes.2012.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of research on residential mobility during pregnancy: consequences for assessment of prenatal environmental exposures

Abstract: Studies on environmental exposures during pregnancy often have limited residential history (e.g., at delivery), potentially introducing exposure misclassification. We reviewed studies reporting residential mobility during pregnancy to summarize current evidence and discuss research implications. A meaningful quantitative combination of results (e.g., meta-analysis), was infeasible owing to variation in study designs. Fourteen studies were identified, of which half were from the US. Most were case-control studi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
154
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
154
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Lupo et al found good agreement between measures estimated at the mother's residential addresses at the time of conception and delivery (Lupo et al, 2010). Furthermore, although a review of research on residential mobility found approximately 20% of the population moved during pregnancy, the median distance moved was less than 10 km (Bell and Belanger, 2012). Thus, the degree of misclassification of maternal exposure due to this temporally mismatched information may be small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, Lupo et al found good agreement between measures estimated at the mother's residential addresses at the time of conception and delivery (Lupo et al, 2010). Furthermore, although a review of research on residential mobility found approximately 20% of the population moved during pregnancy, the median distance moved was less than 10 km (Bell and Belanger, 2012). Thus, the degree of misclassification of maternal exposure due to this temporally mismatched information may be small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Information on time-activity patterns, work, and residential mobility were not available and therefore exposure misclassification may have occurred (Bell and Belanger, 2012). Finally, NO 2 was used as a marker of traffic-related air pollution exposure but NO 2 itself cannot be said to be the causative agent of impaired fetal growth because it forms part of a complex and dynamic mixture of pollutants (WHO, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women may move during the exposure window of interest, although this should be nondifferential by case status. Maternal residential mobility during pregnancy tends to involve short-distance moves with a median of <10 km (42), which would likely leave most women in the same hospital referral region. Further, the simulation extrapolation demonstrated the robustness of the results for SO 2 exposure during the first trimester with a small to moderate measurement error rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%