2023
DOI: 10.3390/atoms11100130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of the 1st EUV Light Sources Code Comparison Workshop

John Sheil,
Oscar Versolato,
Vivek Bakshi
et al.

Abstract: We review the results of the 1st Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Light Sources Code Comparison Workshop. The goal of this workshop was to provide a platform for specialists in EUV light source plasma modeling to benchmark and validate their numerical codes using well-defined case studies. Detailed consideration of a plethora of atomic collisional and radiative processes is required for modeling EUV light source plasmas. Eight institutions spanning four countries contributed data to the workshop. Two topics were addr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 76 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, FLASH uses a ray-tracing algorithm to compute laser energy deposition using the inverse Bremsstrahlung mechanism. As FLASH uses a three-temperature fluid model, the tabulated equation of state and opacity, [21][22][23] and multigroup diffusion radiation transfer, it can accurately compute energy transfer between fluids and radiation throughout the plasma evolution. Figure 1(a) shows different time snap-shots of the hydrodynamic simulation of the Sn target (mass density).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, FLASH uses a ray-tracing algorithm to compute laser energy deposition using the inverse Bremsstrahlung mechanism. As FLASH uses a three-temperature fluid model, the tabulated equation of state and opacity, [21][22][23] and multigroup diffusion radiation transfer, it can accurately compute energy transfer between fluids and radiation throughout the plasma evolution. Figure 1(a) shows different time snap-shots of the hydrodynamic simulation of the Sn target (mass density).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%