2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hedp.2020.100905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of the first charged-particle transport coefficient comparison workshop

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This elementary Hamiltonian captures the fundamental physics that leads to the proposed modes. Likewise, it is motivated by the fact that electronic oscillations in WDM are well described by the UEG due to the relatively weak electron-ion coupling 46 , 68 , 69 . In Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This elementary Hamiltonian captures the fundamental physics that leads to the proposed modes. Likewise, it is motivated by the fact that electronic oscillations in WDM are well described by the UEG due to the relatively weak electron-ion coupling 46 , 68 , 69 . In Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, going beyond LRT is a crucial step for understanding and exploring the effective ion-ion attraction in the media with strongly correlated electrons [88,89], which remains to be an unsolved problem [90,91]. Additionally, the effect of electronic strong correlations on a projectile energy dissipation (stopping power) is one of the long standing problems in WDM [92,93], which can be addressed using the non-linear response theory [73].…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These inherent complexities lead to the failure of perturbative techniques, resulting in differences in predictions of important quantities. While different models generally agree on the thermodynamic and acoustic properties [5,6], important quantities such as transport coefficients can differ by up to an order of magnitude [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%