2020
DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.081305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of the Importance of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Teaching Reading Skills

Abstract: Malay Language subject is a medium of instruction at primary, secondary and tertiary levels in Malaysia education system. In learning and teaching of Malay Language as a formal language, students need to master the four skills of listening, speaking, reading and writing since elementary school. Though reading is an important skill that is able to improve learning motivation as well as language competency, the teaching approach for this skill is always far behind interactive and effective move. In order to faci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interactive relationship between these components subsequently emphasizes the development of good teaching compared to their individual implementation. TPACK knowledge is also best applied in reading skills [22], although Indonesia is reported to have a low category of RC (reading comprehension) ability [21]. This is in line with various reviews reporting students scored lower than 400 in reading literacy skills in the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The interactive relationship between these components subsequently emphasizes the development of good teaching compared to their individual implementation. TPACK knowledge is also best applied in reading skills [22], although Indonesia is reported to have a low category of RC (reading comprehension) ability [21]. This is in line with various reviews reporting students scored lower than 400 in reading literacy skills in the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Several broad reviews of the TPACK literature or instruments have been published since 2010 (e.g., Jaikaran-Doe & Doe, 2015;Voogt et al, 2013) but, over time, some have become dated. More current literature reviews have typically focused on specific issues such as faculty professional development (Moreno, Montoro, & Colon, 2019), faculty professional development within the STEM context (Chai, 2019) or the importance of faculty TPACK in creating effective learning environments within the reading context (Sarjoni, Rahman, Sabil, & Khambari, 2020). Njiku, Mutarutinya, and Maniraho's (2020) study evaluated TPACK survey instruments from 28 peer-reviewed articles.…”
Section: Tpack Literature Review Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%