Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents 2013
DOI: 10.5772/54277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Tools Used for Assessing Teachers’ Level of Knowledge with Regards Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The teachers may be less familiar with such treatments as they are not an area of knowledge related to their university training. In addition, it must be taken into account that the IRA-AGHN or MAE-TDAH is, to date, the only instrument published in the field that presents evidences of factor validity (Soroa et al, 2013), which strengthens the validity of the instrument and ensures adequate measurement of the dimensions it includes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The teachers may be less familiar with such treatments as they are not an area of knowledge related to their university training. In addition, it must be taken into account that the IRA-AGHN or MAE-TDAH is, to date, the only instrument published in the field that presents evidences of factor validity (Soroa et al, 2013), which strengthens the validity of the instrument and ensures adequate measurement of the dimensions it includes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the work of Bekle (2004) is among the studies that have found higher levels of teachers' knowledge of ADHD, with 82.85% of correct responses to the items of the ADHD Knowledge Scale (Jerome, Gordon, & Hustler, 1994). In general terms, one must be cautious when interpreting the results obtained by teachers in the different investigations conducted to assess their level of knowledge of ADHD because most of the tools developed for this purpose do not have acceptable psychometric properties (see the review of those instruments in Soroa, Gorostiaga, & Balluerka, 2013). If we attend to the results of various studies using one of the most popular questionnaires in the literature on the subject, the KADDS (Sciutto et al, 2000), or the Spanish adaptation of this instrument (Jarque, Tárraga, & Miranda, 2007), the percentage of teachers' correct responses ranges between 17.2% (Alkahtani, 2013) and 57% (Stacey, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 20‐item ADHD Knowledge Scale (Jerome, Gordon, & Hustler, ) was used to assess preservice teachers’ general knowledge about ADHD including its biological and family correlates, interventions, and myths about ADHD. The measure demonstrated good validity (e.g., Jerome et al, ; Ohan et al, ) and had been widely used due to its simplicity (Soroa, Gorostiaga, & Balluerka, ). The measure also includes evidence‐based items and items that reflect common myths about ADHD (Pisecco, Huzinec, & Curtis, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in the introduction, however, many of the instruments used to assess teachers" knowledge of ADHD suffer from methodological deficiencies and do not show adequate psychometric properties (Soroa et al, 2012;Soroa et al, 2013). It is in this regard that the IRA-AGHN provides an opportunity to study teachers" real knowledge of this subject, which will in turn enable the design and implementation of training programmes tailored to their needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although research on the ADHD knowledge of teachers is advancing worldwide, the number of instruments which measure this knowledge in a rigorous way is limited (Soroa, Balluerka, & Gorostiaga, 2012;Soroa, Gorostiaga, & Balluerka, 2013). Hence, there is a need to develop instruments for assessing teachers" ADHD knowledge in a valid and reliable way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%