AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum 2019
DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-3094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Transonic Wall Interference Corrections and Considerations for Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, below a certain threshold of working section area, the tunnel walls will begin to influence the flow around the test model, and can result in non-representative flow distributions which are not directly comparable with the intake operation during flight. A typical wall interference mechanism, commonly encountered in supersonic and transonic facilities, is related to shock wave reflection at the tunnel walls, which can then lead to secondary reflections on the aerodynamic surfaces of the test model [20]. The presence of such reflecting shocks alters the flow distribution around the test model which may yield misleading conclusions.…”
Section: Working Section Design and Model Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, below a certain threshold of working section area, the tunnel walls will begin to influence the flow around the test model, and can result in non-representative flow distributions which are not directly comparable with the intake operation during flight. A typical wall interference mechanism, commonly encountered in supersonic and transonic facilities, is related to shock wave reflection at the tunnel walls, which can then lead to secondary reflections on the aerodynamic surfaces of the test model [20]. The presence of such reflecting shocks alters the flow distribution around the test model which may yield misleading conclusions.…”
Section: Working Section Design and Model Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in instrumentation systems have had some impact, particularly optical measurements of model surface 23 properties such as pressure 24 , temperature and deformation [72], but the mainstays of testing in large industrial transonic facilities remain the traditional internal sting balance [73] for forces and moments, and the electronic multiplexed pressure scanner for surface pressure distributions. Developments in instrumentation, data acquisition systems, and data reduction methods [96] have contributed to the data productivity trends of Fig. 5, but Fig.…”
Section: Industrial Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these circumstances bugs are to be expected, and having to reprocess data during and/or after a test is not uncommon. Data corrections for wind tunnel interference effects in ventilated test sections can be problematic for unconventional model configurations and test types, particularly for facilities still relying on older semi-empirical methods [96]. flow physics failure – when an expensive test fails to give the results the customer expects, life can become very difficult for the test engineer.…”
Section: Industrial Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%