Industrial gas turbines are now required to operate more flexibly as a result of incentives and priorities given to renewable forms of energy. This study considers the extraction of compressed air from the gas turbine; it is implemented to store heat energy at periods of a surplus power supply and the reinjection at peak demand. Using an in-house engine performance simulation code, extractions and injections are investigated for a range of flows and for varied rear stage bleeding locations. Inter-stage bleeding is seen to unload the stage of extraction towards choke, while loading the subsequent stages, pushing them towards stall. Extracting after the last stage is shown to be appropriate for a wider range of flows: up to 15% of the compressor inlet flow. Injecting in this location at high flows pushes the closest stage towards stall. The same effect is observed in all the stages but to a lesser magnitude. Up to 17.5% injection seems allowable before compressor stalls; however, a more conservative estimate is expected with higher fidelity models. The study also shows an increase in performance with a rise in flow injection. Varying the design stage pressure ratio distribution brought about an improvement in the stall margin utilized, only for high extraction.
This article presents a validation study of the labyrinth seal testing. Both experimental and numerical simulations are performed. Literature data focused on simple labyrinth seals are surveyed, and two different configurations widely described in literature are investigated: a labyrinth seal with two straight fins against a smooth and a honeycomb land and a seal with three straight fins against a smooth land only. For experimental testing the vacuum-feeding test rig is used, with the high-precision Hot Wire Thermoanemometry method applied for the mass flow evaluation. The dimensions of specimens described in literature are adapted to the in-house test rig conditions, meeting all the geometrical requirements mentioned by the author. The computational method is based on the Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes scheme, with various turbulence models. The results of the simulations show good agreement with the in-house experiment, whereas some discrepancies are found compared to literature data. KEYWORDS LABYRINTH SEAL, HONEYCOMB, SECONDARY FLOWS, EXPERIMENT, TEST RIG NOMENCLATURE
This paper presents the methodology and results of the optimization of a straight-through labyrinth seal with two inclined fins against smooth-land. The optimization was performed using commercial tools implemented in the ANSYS environment, such as goal-driven optimization. The response surfaces were created based on Latin hypercube samples found from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations. The CFD solver, using a steady-state scheme with the k–ω shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model, was applied. A screening algorithm was used to find the best candidates on the response surfaces. The objective function adopted in the labyrinth seal optimization was the minimization of the discharge coefficient value. A wide range of parameters of the fins position and shape were taken into account, with physically justified degrees-of-freedom. The optimization results were supported by the results of an in-house experiment performed on a stationary, linear test rig. The test rig was fed by a high-capacity vacuum air blower with high-precision hot-wire anemometry mass flow evaluation. The reductions in the leakage significantly exceed the uncertainties of the CFD model and the test rig accuracy. The factors that had the most substantial impact on the leakage reduction were the location, inclination, and thickness of the fins. The experimental results were compared with the calculations and the optimization effects, highlighting some tendencies in the labyrinth seal flow behavior. Good agreement was obtained between the optimization results and the experimental data, proving that the presented methodology is sufficient for the labyrinth seal optimization.
The transition to more renewable energy sources of power generation is associated with grid instability and the need for backup power, due to their intermittency. This provides an opportunity for gas turbine engines, especially the aeroderivative (AD) types that generally have higher ramp rates than heavy-duty engines. Nonetheless, higher ramp rates are still necessary to meet more stringent grid requirements, with increased renewables subscription. The study examines ramp rate improvements and performance enhancement through compressed air injection at the back of the high-pressure compressor (HPC). Two configurations of AD engines are considered in the investigation. In-house gas turbine performance simulation software has been used to simulate the steady-state and transient operations for design and off-design performance. Compressed air injection in the study is facilitated by an assumed compressed air storage or an external compressor. The steady-state analysis for power augmentation shows that for the two-spool engine with fixed speed low-pressure compressor (LPC), a 16% increase in power is obtained with 8% of flow injection. The other engine that is intercooled and consists of a variable speed LPC with power turbine shows a 21% increase in power for the same injection amount. Above 8% injection, the HPC of both engines tends towards an adverse rise in pressure ratio. However, up to 15% of flow injection is allowed before the surge point. It is seen generally that the operating point of the LPC moves away from surge, while the opposite is the case for the HPC. For transient simulations focused on ramp rates, the better improvements are shown for the intercooled engine that runs at variable speed. This is a ramp rate improvement of 100% with air injection, while that of the other engine increases by 85%.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.