2020
DOI: 10.1142/s0217732320300116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of uncertainties in the cosmic supernova relic neutrino background

Abstract: We review the computation of and associated uncertainties in the current understanding of the relic neutrino background due to core-collapse supernovae, black hole formation and neutron star merger events. We consider the current status of uncertainties due to the nuclear equation of state (EoS), the progenitor masses, the source supernova neutrino spectrum, the cosmological star formation rate, the stellar initial mass function, neutrino oscillations, and neutrino self-interactions. We summarize the current v… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 The neutrino fluxes from CCSNe can be changed by assumptions that include an approximation of gas motions around the progenitor core and a choice of the equation of state. 7 A systematic uncertainty of the neutrino flux raised by the assumptions is estimated to be ∼50% (private communications with K. Kotake; see also Mathews et al 2020). We include the systematic uncertainty in our model calculations, and show the contours of the forecast in Figure 5.…”
Section: Neutrino Fluxes Measured In the Futurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…6 The neutrino fluxes from CCSNe can be changed by assumptions that include an approximation of gas motions around the progenitor core and a choice of the equation of state. 7 A systematic uncertainty of the neutrino flux raised by the assumptions is estimated to be ∼50% (private communications with K. Kotake; see also Mathews et al 2020). We include the systematic uncertainty in our model calculations, and show the contours of the forecast in Figure 5.…”
Section: Neutrino Fluxes Measured In the Futurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the case of the failed SN, the time-integrated neutrino spectrum depends on the maximum mass of the proto-NS because neutrinos are emitted until a BH formation (Sumiyoshi et al 2006). In the previous studies (Lunardini 2009;Nakazato et al 2015;Mathews et al 2020), the EOS dependence is taken into account only for the component of the failed SN. In the present study, we also consider the EOS dependence for the SN with a NS.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Srn Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neutrino fluxes from CCSNe can be changed by assumptions that include an approximation of gas motions around the progenitor core and a choice of the equation of state 3 . A systematic uncertainty of the neutrino flux raised by the assumptions is estimated to be ∼ 50% (private communications with K. Kotake, see also Mathews et al (2020)). We include the systematic uncertainty into our model calculations, and show the contours of the forecast in Figure 5.…”
Section: Neutrino Fluxes Measured In the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%