2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review on the NO removal from flue gas by oxidation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ClO 2 and O 3 can operate at lower temperatures, 70-160 • C while maintaining efficiency [16,19]. H 2 O 2 and O 3 have an advantage compared to ClO 2 in that preferable reaction products are formed, H 2 O and O 2 , compared to the HCl formed from ClO 2 , but selectivity and reactivity with respect to NO to NO 2 oxidation is still below that of ClO 2 [20]. The high oxidation potential of O 3 has been shown to oxidize NO to higher oxidation states beyond NO 2 if the added O 3 exceeds a molar ratio with NO of 1.2 [21].…”
Section: Choice Of Oxidizing Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ClO 2 and O 3 can operate at lower temperatures, 70-160 • C while maintaining efficiency [16,19]. H 2 O 2 and O 3 have an advantage compared to ClO 2 in that preferable reaction products are formed, H 2 O and O 2 , compared to the HCl formed from ClO 2 , but selectivity and reactivity with respect to NO to NO 2 oxidation is still below that of ClO 2 [20]. The high oxidation potential of O 3 has been shown to oxidize NO to higher oxidation states beyond NO 2 if the added O 3 exceeds a molar ratio with NO of 1.2 [21].…”
Section: Choice Of Oxidizing Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NOx reduction efficiency equaled 80-85% for ammonia at an NSR of 1.5, 66-68% for urea at an NSR of 1.5, and 32-34% for methane at an NSR of 2. Moreover, the primary reactions affecting NOx reduction in the reactor during reducing agent injection were identified as reactions (1) and (2) for ammonia and urea and as reactions (3) and (4) for methane [29,30]:…”
Section: Nox Reduction Performances Of Ammonia Urea and Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NO x reduction efficiency equaled 80-85% for ammonia at an NSR of 1.5, 66-68% for urea at an NSR of 1.5, and 32-34% for methane at an NSR of 2. Moreover, the primary reactions affecting NO x reduction in the reactor during reducing agent injection were identified as reactions (1) and (2) for ammonia and urea and as reactions (3) and (4) for methane [29,30]: Methane exhibited a lower NOx reduction efficiency than ammonia and urea but generated a significantly smaller amount of N2O and offered the benefit of a lower (by ~80 °C) reaction temperature range. Considering that N2O is a potent greenhouse gas, it is The N 2 O levels generated using methane (18-21 ppm) were significantly lower than those generated using urea (157 ppm) and ammonia (51 ppm).…”
Section: No X Reduction Performances Of Ammonia Urea and Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of the burner and its modes of operation largely determine the intensity of flame ignition, the conditions and rate of mixing of the fuel with the oxidizer and the maximum temperature level in the combustion core. By changing the design of the burner, it is possible to influence these parameters and, thereby, reduce the formation of NO X from 30 to 60% without worsening the combustion process at reduced capital and operating costs [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%