2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reviewing ensemble classification methods in breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The ensemble algorithms, although more complex in their methodology, have been shown to obtain greater performance in other works. In our results, however, they also did not achieve greater performance values [40].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…The ensemble algorithms, although more complex in their methodology, have been shown to obtain greater performance in other works. In our results, however, they also did not achieve greater performance values [40].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…The ensemble methods develop and combine the multiple machine learning models to produce better-aggregated solutions than the individual models by compensating the mistakes [58][59][60]. Generally, they use generated solutions of the individual learning methods as inputs and produce ultimate solutions through a wide range of processing techniques, including averaging, bagging, boosting, stacking, and voting [61].…”
Section: Majority Voting Ensemble Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ensemble technique forms a group of learners with a classification method and these learners are trained with 'x' training data. The decision of each trained learner on the 'x' test data is evaluated and the joint decision of the learners constitutes the final decision of the method [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Ensemble Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%