Reviews and Self-Selection Bias with Operational Implications

Abstract

Reviews for products and services written by previous consumers have become an influential input to the purchase decision of customers. Many service businesses monitor the reviews closely for feedback as well as detecting service flaws, and they have become part of the performance review for service managers with rewards tied to improvement in the aggregate rating. Many empirical papers have documented a bias in the aggregate ratings, arising because of customers’ inherent self-selection in their choices and bounded rationality in evaluating previous reviews. Although there is a vast empirical literature analyzing reviews, theoretical models that try to isolate and explain the bias in ratings are relatively few. Assuming consumers simply substitute the average rating that they see as a proxy for quality, we give a precise characterization of the self-selection bias on ratings of an assortment of products when consumers confound ex ante innate preferences for a product or service with ex post experience and service quality and do not separate the two. We develop a parsimonious choice model for consumer purchase decisions and show that the mechanism leads to an upward bias, which is more pronounced for niche products. Based on our theoretical characterization, we study the effect on pricing and assortment decisions of the firm when potential customers purchase based on the biased ratings. Our results give insights into how quality, prices, and customer feedback are intricately tied together for service firms. This paper was accepted by David Simchi-Levi, operations management.

An Overview of Malaria Transmission Mechanisms, Control, and Modeling

“…Consequently, we did not elaborate on the host immune response to malaria nor on technological advances in diagnosing and treating malaria since they are widely covered elsewhere [ 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ]. Additionally, this paper faces two challenges, namely (1) a self-selection bias that might lead to a more prominent emphasis on some cross-cutting topics, and (2) not considering recently published papers [ 95 ]. Nonetheless, this review provides readers with an overview of malaria from a global perspective.…”