2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcz.2021.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision and cladistic analysis of subfamily Nothopuginae (Solifugae, Ammotrechidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The family Ammotrechidae Roewer, 1934 occupies the third position in terms of generic diversity within Solifugae, only outrun by Daesiidae and Rhagodidae (Harvey 2003;Iuri et al 2021). This family is currently divided into five subfamilies: Ammotrechinae Roewer, 1934, Mortolinae Mello-Leitão, 1938, Nothopuginae Maury, 1976, Oltacolinae Roewer, 1934, and Saronominae Roewer, 1934.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The family Ammotrechidae Roewer, 1934 occupies the third position in terms of generic diversity within Solifugae, only outrun by Daesiidae and Rhagodidae (Harvey 2003;Iuri et al 2021). This family is currently divided into five subfamilies: Ammotrechinae Roewer, 1934, Mortolinae Mello-Leitão, 1938, Nothopuginae Maury, 1976, Oltacolinae Roewer, 1934, and Saronominae Roewer, 1934.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of its generic diversity is contained in Ammotrechinae and Saronominae, respectively with ten and five genera (Harvey 2003). Mortolinae and Nothopuginae, as recently redefined (see Iuri et al 2021), comprise three genera each, whereas Oltacolinae has remained monogeneric. Until recently, the internal classification of Ammotrechidae was devoid of any phylogenetic structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations