2008
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.65621-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revision of the taxonomic status of the species Rhizobium leguminosarum (Frank 1879) Frank 1889AL, Rhizobium phaseoli Dangeard 1926AL and Rhizobium trifolii Dangeard 1926AL. R. trifolii is a later synonym of R. leguminosarum. Reclassification of the strain R. leguminosarum DSM 30132 (=NCIMB 11478) as Rhizobium pisi sp. nov.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
65
0
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
65
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…31 However, as this reclassification was never validated, all these species remain valid until 2008 in which our investigation group revised the taxonomic status of these species. 60 Our results showed that the valid species are R. leguminosarum and R. phaseoli, whereas R. trifolii is a later synonym of R. leguminosarum. Moreover, a problem with the type strains of R. leguminosarum deposited in different culture collections was detected and a new species named R. pisi was proposed to include one of these two strains deposited in DSMZ and NCIMB collections from Germany and United Kingdom, respectively.…”
Section: Some Problems In Rhizobial Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…31 However, as this reclassification was never validated, all these species remain valid until 2008 in which our investigation group revised the taxonomic status of these species. 60 Our results showed that the valid species are R. leguminosarum and R. phaseoli, whereas R. trifolii is a later synonym of R. leguminosarum. Moreover, a problem with the type strains of R. leguminosarum deposited in different culture collections was detected and a new species named R. pisi was proposed to include one of these two strains deposited in DSMZ and NCIMB collections from Germany and United Kingdom, respectively.…”
Section: Some Problems In Rhizobial Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although the current classification of bacteria is based in the 16S rRNA gene that has allowed the description of non-nodulating species of rhizobia, it has limitations to differentiate among close species 59,60 and for this purpose several metabolic genes (housekeeping) have been proposed in several groups of bacteria. 61 In rhizobia the two first genes analyzed were recA and atpD 62 and currently they have been sequenced in many rhizobial species showing their usefulness in differentiation of species whose 16S rRNA genes are nearly identical.…”
Section: Recent Changes In the Taxonomy Of Rhizobiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phenotypic characterization was performed in this study using the methodology previously reported [19,23]. The type strains of the type species for all the defined genera in Family Rhizobiaceae were included in the phenotypic study as reference (Table 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest sequence similarities were 87.8 % for recA, 92.2 % for atpD and 89.0 % for glnII to Rhizobium leguminosarum ATCC 14482, Rhizobium tropici USDA 9030 and Rhizobium etli CFN 42 T , respectively. These three most closely related species are all able to nodulate common bean (Martínez-Romero et al, 1991;Ramírez-Bahena et al, 2008;Segovia et al, 1993) in both tropical and temperate regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%