2019
DOI: 10.1002/arco.5180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting ancient DNA insights into the human history of the Pacific Islands

Abstract: We respond to issues raised in the recent Forum on "Ancient DNA and its contribution to understanding the human history of the Pacific Islands" in Archaeology in Oceania by Bedford et al. We first present an emerging model for the early peopling of Vanuatu combining the genetic and archaeological evidence. Second, we respond specifically to the criticisms of two contributors: Matisoo-Smith and Sand. We discuss various misconceptions about the Teouma Lapita cemetery and about sampling issues in DNA research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genomic studies also suggest that there was admixture between East Asian and Near Oceania ancestry. However, it is still debated where the admixture occurred: at the northern coastal region of the New Guinea Islands while East Asian ancestry moved toward Remote Oceania (9); or in Remote Oceania, where Near Oceania ancestry later arrived and mixed with East Asian ancestry (15).…”
Section: Historical Peopling Of the Pacificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic studies also suggest that there was admixture between East Asian and Near Oceania ancestry. However, it is still debated where the admixture occurred: at the northern coastal region of the New Guinea Islands while East Asian ancestry moved toward Remote Oceania (9); or in Remote Oceania, where Near Oceania ancestry later arrived and mixed with East Asian ancestry (15).…”
Section: Historical Peopling Of the Pacificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another recently developed technique not discussed in the chapters in this section, ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis, is increasingly being used to draw conclusions about the ancestry and past migrations of Pacific Islanders. While promising, it is not without controversy (Bedford et al 2018;Lipson et al 2020;Posth et al , 2019Spriggs et al 2019;Spriggs and Reich 2020). Generally speaking, it is important to bear in mind that even the most sophisticated scientific techniques are not infallible, and that archaeology in the Pacific, as elsewhere, is far from being an apolitical pursuit .…”
Section: Looking Beyondmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some measure of continuity between founding Lapita populations and later societies in both Near and Remote Oceania can be established (Kirch 2017: 106), documented transformations will continue to stimulate debate on the significance of the changes observed at archaeological sites yielding later pottery styles (Leclerc 2019), paralleling similar debates among historical linguists and biological anthropologists, and not limited to the post-Lapita period (Geraghty 2002(Geraghty , 2004Harris et al 2020;Sheppard 2019;Spriggs et al 2019).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%