2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-8043(00)00171-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Currie — how low can you go?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Upper limits are calculated as described in [33] and given at 90 % C.L. Further details about the analysis procedure can be found in [31].…”
Section: Germanium Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upper limits are calculated as described in [33] and given at 90 % C.L. Further details about the analysis procedure can be found in [31].…”
Section: Germanium Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to treat correctly these cases we have referred to the procedure described in (Currie, 1968) and (Hurtgen, 2000). For each gamma peak in the measured spectrum we have calculated a decision-threshold (L c ) and a detection limit (L d ) defined in the following way:…”
Section: Gamma Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operationally, it leads to two concepts: the a priori "detection limit" L D and the a posteriori "critical level" L C [11]. The a priori detection limit, L D , made before counting the person, determines the minimum acquisition time needed to detect a given activity of a radionuclide [12,13]. The a posteriori critical level L C (or decision level), calculated after counting, evaluates the highest limit of the activity of a radionuclide that has not been clearly detected in a photopeak zone.…”
Section: Detector Efficiency and Limit Of Detection In Case Of Low Enmentioning
confidence: 99%