2016
DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2016.1195431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting FDI-led growth hypothesis: the role of sector characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical studies, such as Vu Le and Suruga (2005a, b), Durham (2004), Borensztein et al (1998), and Balasubramanyam et al (1996), have investigated the FDI-growth nexus. They have stressed that the possibility of a positive impact of FDI on economic growth depends on such mechanisms as the technology-upgrading progress, human capital investment, absorptive capacity, and trade policy adopted by the host country (Gönel and Aksoy 2016;Katircioglu 2009;Silajdzic and Mehic 2016). These studies generally considered a panel of countries, suggesting that FDI can have a positive but indirect effect on economic growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies, such as Vu Le and Suruga (2005a, b), Durham (2004), Borensztein et al (1998), and Balasubramanyam et al (1996), have investigated the FDI-growth nexus. They have stressed that the possibility of a positive impact of FDI on economic growth depends on such mechanisms as the technology-upgrading progress, human capital investment, absorptive capacity, and trade policy adopted by the host country (Gönel and Aksoy 2016;Katircioglu 2009;Silajdzic and Mehic 2016). These studies generally considered a panel of countries, suggesting that FDI can have a positive but indirect effect on economic growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, growth impacts of FDI remain inconclusive, being more evident in growth theory than in the many empirical studies (Iamsiraroj and Ulubasoglu, 2015). Although findings on direct effects of FDI on economic growth are mixed, the importance of the absorptive capacity of recipient countries is regularly highlighted (e.g., Borensztein et al, 1998;de Mello, 1999;Alfaro et al, 2004;Makki and Somwaru, 2004;Gönel and Aksoy, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea that different sectors vary in their potential to absorb foreign technology and create linkages with the rest of the economy was early discussed in the seminal work by Hirschman (1958). However, as stated by Gönel and Aksoy (2016), the literature still largely neglects the sectoral dimension of FDI when studying the effect of FDI on economic growth. Moreover, studies that investigate possible channels of absorptive capacity, while distinguishing between the FDI recipient sectors, are scarce, especially in the case of developing countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tsaurai (2018) found that FDI promotes stock market improvement through its influence on human capital, which induces economic expansion. A closely related study for OECD indicates FDI inflows to both ITC-base and non-ICT base do not induce economic progress (Gönel and Aksoy 2016). The finding further showed FDI influence on ICT-base could be felt only if the economy has achieved the minimum threshold of its absorptive capacity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%