2015 IEEE 23rd Annual International Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines 2015
DOI: 10.1109/fccm.2015.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Serial Arithmetic: A Performance and Tradeoff Analysis for Parallel Applications on Modern FPGAs

Abstract: Serial arithmetic cores reduce area compared to bitparallel alternatives, but are generally assumed to be inappropriate for high-performance FPGA applications due to a significant reduction in throughput. In this paper, we perform a performance and tradeoff analysis of Xilinx 7-series specialized architectures for a novel serial adder tree and multiplier. We show that these serial arithmetic architectures significantly improve functional density due to an average 2u clock speedup compared to bit-parallel alter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PISO sits at the midpoint between fully serial (SISO) and parallel (PIPO) in terms of area and performance [17]. With increase in precision Pwhich, for traditional arithmetic, can solve problems for which P req ≤ P -PISO suffers less from area growth and operating frequency f max degradation than PIPO [18] while also being dramatically faster than SISO [19]. While we focus exclusively on hardware implementations here, the limitations revealed for PISO apply equally to software libraries since precision must be chosen prior to the iterative algorithm's commencement.…”
Section: A Computation Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…PISO sits at the midpoint between fully serial (SISO) and parallel (PIPO) in terms of area and performance [17]. With increase in precision Pwhich, for traditional arithmetic, can solve problems for which P req ≤ P -PISO suffers less from area growth and operating frequency f max degradation than PIPO [18] while also being dramatically faster than SISO [19]. While we focus exclusively on hardware implementations here, the limitations revealed for PISO apply equally to software libraries since precision must be chosen prior to the iterative algorithm's commencement.…”
Section: A Computation Timementioning
confidence: 99%