2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icdm.2017.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting Spectral Graph Clustering with Generative Community Models

Abstract: The methodology of community detection can be divided into two principles: imposing a network model on a given graph, or optimizing a designed objective function. The former provides guarantees on theoretical detectability but falls short when the graph is inconsistent with the underlying model. The latter is model-free but fails to provide quality assurance for the detected communities. In this paper, we propose a novel unified framework to combine the advantages of these two principles. The presented method,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we propose to identify the number of junctions in uncertain subterranean environments using an unsupervised learning framework. Cluster analysis is one of the most fundamental problems in machine learning for finding groups of similar data points without any supervi-sion [21]. Many existing clustering methods such as K-means clustering learn hidden structures from data points that are connected within convex boundaries.…”
Section: A Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we propose to identify the number of junctions in uncertain subterranean environments using an unsupervised learning framework. Cluster analysis is one of the most fundamental problems in machine learning for finding groups of similar data points without any supervi-sion [21]. Many existing clustering methods such as K-means clustering learn hidden structures from data points that are connected within convex boundaries.…”
Section: A Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past two decades, the graph Laplacian matrix and its variants have been widely adopted for solving various research tasks, including graph partitioning [42], data clustering [5,32,56], community detection [7,13,50], consensus in networks [37,53], accelerated distributed optimization [29], dimensionality reduction [2,52], entity disambiguation [46,[60][61][62][63][64], link prediction [15,19,20,59], graph signal processing [12,48], centrality measures for graph connectivity [6], multi-layer network analysis [11,30], interconnected physical systems [43], network vulnerability assessment [9], image segmentation [18,47], gene expression [28,31,39], among others. The fundamental task is to represent the data of interest as a graph for analysis, where a node represents an entity (e.g., a pixel in an image or a user in an online social network) and an edge represents similarity between two multivariate data samples or actual relation (e.g., friendship) between nodes [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%