Revolt of the Colonized: Abraham Geiger's Wissenschaft des Judentums as a Challenge to Christian Hegemony in the Academy

D.A. Chwolson as an Expert Witness and Student of Abraham Geiger: Three Chapters from a Scientific Biography

“…Heschel (1999) . Во втором издании книги о средневековых обвинениях против евреев Хвольсон дает развернутую аргумен-тацию этого тезиса 37 , а вернувшись к нему в одной из послед-них своих опубликованных работ, Хвольсон заостряет его еще сильнее:…”

St. St. Blicher og jøderne. Blichers politiske forfatterskab

“…46 Denne konceptualisering af den tysk-jødiske orientalisme som forbundet med en kolonialisme, der er indadfrem for udadrettet, finder man også hos andre kritikere end Hess. Se Pasto (1998), Heschel (1999), Zantop (1997), Efron (2004), Mufti (2007) og Pollock (1993). Faelles for disse er, at de implicit følger Ann Laura Stolers credo om, at moderne postkolonial teori har orienteret sig efter et imperialisme-begreb, der er for snaevert.…”

The Great Chain of Orientalism: Jewish Identity, Stigma Management, and Ethnic Exclusion in Israel

“…This argument has two local implications and one global one. First, a large scholarly literature on a Jewish inferiority complex has only begun to interpret that complex as a historical reaction to Orientalism or internal colonization (Heschel 1999;Hess 2000;Khazzoom 1998;Kramer 1999) or to connect it to communal relations within the Jewish world (Aschheim 1982;Khazzoom 1998;Raz Krakotzkin 1989;Rodrigue 1993), and then only in limited local instances. In contrast, this work demonstrates that the effect of orientalism on Jewish identity was massive.…”

“…Third, that invasion led to a sharp turn in orientalism, which began to justify colonialism by producing the east as incapable of ruling itself. Much work on colonialism and classification has followed these basic connections, either on the same grand historical scale (Wolff 1994) or on a smaller scale (Anderson 1991;Heschel 1999;Hess 2000;Mitchell 1991;Stoler 1992). Similarly, the assertion that the power to classify is an important form of domination is a guiding insight of the U.S. literature on racialization (Espiritu 1992;Jenkins 1994;Kibria 1998;Omi andWinant [1986] 1994).…”

“…This paper is very much in the post-colonial vein. However the focus of post-colonial scholarship has been on the relationship between the colonizer and the colonized, not on the relationship between different groups of stigmatized others (e.g., Heschel 1999;Hess 2000;Memmi 1965;Said 1978;Spivak 1988;Trinh 1989). 6 As such, the kind of chain I elaborate here has not appeared before.…”