2014
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2014.14335abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rewards and performance: A comparison across creative and routine tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result of a weak or no prize effect is consistent with Araujo et al (2016) who perform a between-subject comparison of slider task performance varying incentives and find only weak incentive effects. There are, however, other studies that do find that slider positioning efforts respond positively and significantly to increases in financial incentives (e.g., Abeler and Jäger 2015;Lee 2015;Neckermann, Warnke, and Bradler 2014). Note that nonmonotonic responses to changes in piece rates are observed in between-subject studies of other real-effort tasks (e.g., Ariely et al 2009;Gneezy and Rustichini 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our result of a weak or no prize effect is consistent with Araujo et al (2016) who perform a between-subject comparison of slider task performance varying incentives and find only weak incentive effects. There are, however, other studies that do find that slider positioning efforts respond positively and significantly to increases in financial incentives (e.g., Abeler and Jäger 2015;Lee 2015;Neckermann, Warnke, and Bradler 2014). Note that nonmonotonic responses to changes in piece rates are observed in between-subject studies of other real-effort tasks (e.g., Ariely et al 2009;Gneezy and Rustichini 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…it was unique to the idea pool). Evaluating originality in this manner has been widely adopted in previous research (Bradler et al ., 2014). Scoring for the above three measures was done by two research assistants who were acquainted with the task and the scoring procedures and were blind to the treatments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…providing customer support), and creative tasks, which require users to stretch their thoughts to provide creative solutions (e.g. generating new ideas for a marketing campaign) (Bradler et al ., 2014; Brüggen et al ., 2018). For both types of tasks, user engagement and task performance are two important metrics in both research and practice (Agarwal and Karahanna, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each one attends three sessions. At the start of the first session, they observe the result of a random variable that determines how many minutes they can perform some pleasant activity (or avoid an activity that entails disutility or effort; for instance, some repetitive task, Neckermann et al , 2014, or Augenblick and Rabin, 2018). During the first two sessions, they choose between spending the minutes they won or saving them for next session; this allows estimation of the individual utility parameters β and δ which in turn can be used to estimate Dv , the cost of suffering a present bias without taking care of it.…”
Section: Model: Hyperbolic Discounting Under Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%