2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15555-0_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reweighted Random Walks for Graph Matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
510
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 364 publications
(511 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
510
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed algorithm (SMCM) was compared with seven state-of-the-art methods including SM [4], SMAC [16], PM [25], IPFP [5], GAGM [15], RRWM [6], and DDMCM [7]. The authors' implementations were used for SM, SMAC 1 , PM 2 , IPFP 3 , DDMCM, and RRWM 4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed algorithm (SMCM) was compared with seven state-of-the-art methods including SM [4], SMAC [16], PM [25], IPFP [5], GAGM [15], RRWM [6], and DDMCM [7]. The authors' implementations were used for SM, SMAC 1 , PM 2 , IPFP 3 , DDMCM, and RRWM 4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A graph matching solution M is represented by a set of assignments or matches The graph matching score of x is evaluated by x T Wx which corresponds to the sum of all similarity values covered by the matching. Therefore, graph matching is mathematically formulated as the following IQP problem [4,7,6]:…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations