2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11114967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RF Exposure Assessment for Various Poses of Patient Assistant in Open MRI Environment

Abstract: In this study, the radio-frequency (RF) energy exposure of patient assistants was assessed for an open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system based on numerical computations of the head and body RF coil. Various poses of the patient assistants were defined to see how poorly they affected the RF energy exposure. For the assessments, the peak spatial-averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) levels were carefully compared with each patient assistant pose based on the finite-difference time domain calculations of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the 7.0 T MRI has recently provided limited approval by the US FDA for use in head and extremities (arms and legs) imaging, whole body imaging is not permitted due to safety issues, including tissue heating, which occurs because UHF MRI requires a large amount of RF energy for human imaging [7]. Hence, RF safety studies have evaluated higher specific absorption rates (SAR), which indirectly measure tissue heating upon RF exposure [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], and research has focused on signal strength enhancement and SAR safety for RF coils used in 7.0 T MRI approved for clinical use. The required RF power to excite a spin system increases with the B 0 -field strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the 7.0 T MRI has recently provided limited approval by the US FDA for use in head and extremities (arms and legs) imaging, whole body imaging is not permitted due to safety issues, including tissue heating, which occurs because UHF MRI requires a large amount of RF energy for human imaging [7]. Hence, RF safety studies have evaluated higher specific absorption rates (SAR), which indirectly measure tissue heating upon RF exposure [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], and research has focused on signal strength enhancement and SAR safety for RF coils used in 7.0 T MRI approved for clinical use. The required RF power to excite a spin system increases with the B 0 -field strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the RF energy exposure of patient assistants. A previous study [ 22 ] has shown that several variables can affect the distribution of SAR in a patient assistant, including distance from the head or body transmit RF coil and configuration of interventional treatments at 0.3 T in an open MRI system. In this study, we numerically investigated RF energy exposures of patient assistants using planar-shaped RF coil models, which are widely used to transmit RF coil type, particularly at 1.2 T in an open MRI system under various exposure conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%