2016 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium (RWS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/rws.2016.7444369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RF propagation through vegetation with time-varying moisture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in signal strength trend can be attributed to the wavelength of the signal relative to the test sample bag and its contents. The moisture is thought to enhance surface waves, hence enhancing signal strength at certain frequencies whilst increasing signal attenuation at others, especially higher frequencies [ 55 ]. Unlike WSN and TAG2, there is no clear pattern that can be observed from TAG1 and this indicates that there are no differences in the RSSI reading for different moisture content levels in the samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in signal strength trend can be attributed to the wavelength of the signal relative to the test sample bag and its contents. The moisture is thought to enhance surface waves, hence enhancing signal strength at certain frequencies whilst increasing signal attenuation at others, especially higher frequencies [ 55 ]. Unlike WSN and TAG2, there is no clear pattern that can be observed from TAG1 and this indicates that there are no differences in the RSSI reading for different moisture content levels in the samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, existing propagation models do not account for the effects of grass moisture on near-ground RF propagation in a large nonuniform grass area. Authors in [94] conducted measurements of signal strengths between two horn antennas in a nearground setting with varying moisture on grasses at 3-4 GHz. In the experiments, decreasing the moisture content of the grasses caused decreasing signal strengths, implying a dielectric waveguide effect as a result of wet grasses.…”
Section: Channel Modeling and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to existing models, authors in [96] considered the effects of interference between legacy transmissions and backscatter transmission, interference between backscatter nodes, and non-linear EH model in modelling and analysing the backscatter system. A time-switching (TS)/power splitting (PS) operation scheme was designed where devices can harvest Investigate the behaviour of tag Use low-cost devices to obtain Measured impedance was used impedance with varying CW real-time impedance values to optimize tag design [91], [92] Investigate the expected returns Model the backscatter channel A complete BackCom link budget was and gains of backscatter channel considering the mechanism of developed for system characterization RF propagation [93] Investigate the expected returns Model the channel of retro-directive Retro-directive channels showed similar and gains of backscatter channel tags in the presence of fading properties to one-way radio link [94] Investigate the effects of RF Take signal strength measurements Moisture showed direct relation with propagation in wet grasses between two horn antennas signal strength implying close to the ground waveguide effect [95] Model and analyze AmBC Develop models for legacy and Legacy link interference is network backscatter link and analyze addressed using OFDM. capacity bounds [96] Investigate effect of interference Model an operating scheme that Near optimal outage capacity in BackCom channel underlaying switches between harvesting and was achieved cellular network transmitting times [97] Investigate city-wide ambient Measure RF power levels along roads Cellular communication bands were RF signal density and busy areas with human traffic most suitable for BackCom in cities [98] Channel estimation in multi-tag Model the relationship between moving Estimate channel of multi-tag AmBC tag signals and collision (up to five) AmBC network.…”
Section: Channel Modeling and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, existing propagation models do not account for the effects of grass moisture on near-ground RF propagation in a large nonuniform grass area. Authors in [94] conducted measurements of signal strengths between two horn antennas in a nearground setting with varying moisture on grasses at 3-4 GHz.…”
Section: Channel Modeling and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Content may change prior to final publication. [91], [92] Investigate the expected returns Model the backscatter channel A complete BackCom link budget was and gains of backscatter channel considering the mechanism of developed for system characterization RF propagation [93] Investigate the expected returns Model the channel of retro-directive Retro-directive channels showed similar and gains of backscatter channel tags in the presence of fading properties to one-way radio link [94] Investigate the effects of RF Take signal strength measurements Moisture showed direct relation with propagation in wet grasses between two horn antennas signal strength implying close to the ground waveguide effect [95] Model and analyze AmBC Develop models for legacy and Legacy link interference is network backscatter link and analyze addressed using OFDM. capacity bounds [96] Investigate effect of interference Model an operating scheme that Near optimal outage capacity in BackCom channel underlaying switches between harvesting and was achieved cellular network transmitting times [97] Investigate city-wide ambient Measure RF power levels along roads Cellular communication bands were RF signal density and busy areas with human traffic most suitable for BackCom in cities [98] Channel estimation in multi-tag Model the relationship between moving Estimate channel of multi-tag AmBC tag signals and collision (up to five) AmBC network.…”
Section: Channel Modeling and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%