2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10482-018-01219-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhodobacter thermarum sp. nov., a novel phototrophic bacterium isolated from sediment of a hot spring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cellular fatty acids of strain CYK-10 T were composed of C 18 : 1 ω7c (64.8 %), C 16 : 0 (8.0 %), C 18 : 1 ω7c 11-methyl (5.9 %), C 10 : 0 3-OH (5.8 %), summed feature 3 (C 16 : 1 ω7c and/or C 16 : 1 ω6c; 4.6 %), C 18 : 0 3-OH (4.4 %) and C 18 : 0 (3.4 %) ( Table S2). The major cellular fatty acid of this novel strain was C 18 : 1 ω7c, which is consistent with those reported for the genus Rhodobacter [4,12,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Chemotaxonomysupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cellular fatty acids of strain CYK-10 T were composed of C 18 : 1 ω7c (64.8 %), C 16 : 0 (8.0 %), C 18 : 1 ω7c 11-methyl (5.9 %), C 10 : 0 3-OH (5.8 %), summed feature 3 (C 16 : 1 ω7c and/or C 16 : 1 ω6c; 4.6 %), C 18 : 0 3-OH (4.4 %) and C 18 : 0 (3.4 %) ( Table S2). The major cellular fatty acid of this novel strain was C 18 : 1 ω7c, which is consistent with those reported for the genus Rhodobacter [4,12,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Chemotaxonomysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Differential characteristics of Rhodobacter tardus CYK-10 T and the type strains of related Rhodobacter species Strains: 1, CYK-10 T ; 2, Rhodobacter thermarum YIM 73036 T ; 3, Rhodobacter flagellatus SYSU G03088 T ; 4, Rhodobacter blasticus ATCC 33485 T ; 5, Rhodobacter capsulatus ATCC 11166 T . Data for R. thermarum YIM 73036 T from Khan et al [22], R. flagellatus SYSU G03088 T and R. blasticus ATCC 33485 T from Xian et al [23] and R. capsulatus ATCC 11166 T from Wang et al [12] and from Subhash and Lee [19]. +, Positive reaction; -, negative reaction.…”
Section: Genome Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fatty acid compositions of the six strains were similar, with only limited differences in the proportions of some fatty acids. The major cellular fatty acid of these strains was C 18:1 w7c, which is consistent with those reported for the genus Rhodobacter (Khan et al 2019;Pujalte et al 2014;Suresh et al 2020;Wang et al 2014;Xian et al 2020). Strain CCP-1 T exhibited a complex polar lipid pro le consisting of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylcholine (PC), two uncharacterized aminophospholipids (APL1 and APL2) and two uncharacterized phospholipids (PL1 and PL2) ( Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Members of this genus are Gram-staining-negative and have an ovoid to rod-shaped morphology [2,13,17]. The chemotaxonomic features include ubiquinone 10 as predominant quinone, C 18 : 0 and C 18 : 1 ω7c branched fatty acids as major fatty acids, and phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) as major polar lipids [2,13,18]. The DNA G+C contents of member of this genus are 62.8-73.2 mol%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%