Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling, and Simulation 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3229631.3229650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RiBoSOM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) CGRA fabric: We compare the SOM implementation on GAP9 with a CGRA that targets dense linear algebra applications, including SOM [3]. The authors employed two CGRA fabrics, namely Dynamically Reconfigurable Resource Array (DRRA) [20] for dense linear algebra and Distributed Memory Architecture (DiMArch) [21] for streaming scratchpad memory, connected through a configuration network-onchip (NoC), as described in [3]. Each DRRA cell includes a 16-bit fixed-point arithmetic Data Processing Unit (DPU), a register file, and a sequencer responsible for cell configuration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3) CGRA fabric: We compare the SOM implementation on GAP9 with a CGRA that targets dense linear algebra applications, including SOM [3]. The authors employed two CGRA fabrics, namely Dynamically Reconfigurable Resource Array (DRRA) [20] for dense linear algebra and Distributed Memory Architecture (DiMArch) [21] for streaming scratchpad memory, connected through a configuration network-onchip (NoC), as described in [3]. Each DRRA cell includes a 16-bit fixed-point arithmetic Data Processing Unit (DPU), a register file, and a sequencer responsible for cell configuration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leveraging hardware acceleration is an alternative approach to enhance the efficiency of computationally intensive algorithms. Previous research conducted by [3] has proposed the utilization of SOM for accelerating genome identification processes. The CGRA implementation [9] observed a less than 1% quality loss when training SOM networks using 16-bit fixed-point number representations, compared to 32-bit FP implementation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations