2009
DOI: 10.1029/2009ja014131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rice Convection Model simulation of the substorm‐associated injection of an observed plasma bubble into the inner magnetosphere: 2. Simulation results

Abstract: [1] We present results from a Rice Convection Model simulation of the early expansion phase of a substorm that occurred 22 July 1998. The theoretical basis of the simulation is the idea that the plasma injected into the inner magnetosphere during a substorm primarily consists of a low-content plasma bubble, which is made up of flux tubes with lower values of the entropy parameter PV 5/3 than their neighbors. As discussed in an accompanying paper, to simulate this event, we carefully tailor model inputs to fit … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
45
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
9
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fejer et al [1990] proposed that the magnetic field reconfiguration of the magnetosphere due to a northward turning and the associated shrinkage of the polar cap may effectively prolong the overshielding time period. This effect has been confirmed by the Rice Convection Model (RCM) with a time-dependent magnetic field model [Sazykin, 2000;De Zeeuw et al, 2004;Maruyama et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2009] and has been discussed with observations [Wei et al, 2008b[Wei et al, , 2009. On the other hand, the IMF northward turning is preferable to trigger substorms [Lyons et al, 1997], but the effect of substorm on overshielding, reduction [e.g., Huang et al, 2004;Huang, 2009] or enhancement [Wei et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2009] is still a controversial issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fejer et al [1990] proposed that the magnetic field reconfiguration of the magnetosphere due to a northward turning and the associated shrinkage of the polar cap may effectively prolong the overshielding time period. This effect has been confirmed by the Rice Convection Model (RCM) with a time-dependent magnetic field model [Sazykin, 2000;De Zeeuw et al, 2004;Maruyama et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2009] and has been discussed with observations [Wei et al, 2008b[Wei et al, , 2009. On the other hand, the IMF northward turning is preferable to trigger substorms [Lyons et al, 1997], but the effect of substorm on overshielding, reduction [e.g., Huang et al, 2004;Huang, 2009] or enhancement [Wei et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2009] is still a controversial issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, the overshielding signatures are observed even under stable southward IMF [Fejer et al, 2007;Ebihara et al, 2008], implying that IMF northward turning is not a necessary condition for overshielding. What has become clear is that IMF northward turning is the most effective factor to cause overshielding, but some other factors, either outside or inside the magnetosphere-ionosphere system, can also contribute to the overshielding effect, such as a large drop of solar wind dynamic pressure [e.g., Wei et al, 2008b] and substorm processes [e.g., Ebihara et al, 2008;Wei et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2009].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the model results indicate that the inductive electric fields dominate when Geotail observed fast earthward flow. This is partly due to the fact that the peak of the model's potential electric field occurs slightly west of Geotail, as illustrated in Figure 2 of Zhang et al [2009]. The series of spikes in the observed V x and E y probably represent the effects of waves bouncing back and forth between the middle plasma sheet and the high-magnetic field region near the Earth.…”
Section: Electric Fields and Flowsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As shown by Birn et al [2004], flow vortices appear at the flanks of the bubble, twisting the magnetic field, and causing a downward (upward) field-aligned current at the dawnside (duskside) flank, and forming a local wedge like current system [e.g., Wolf, 1993, 1999;Sergeev et al, 1996a;Birn and Hesse, 1996;Birn et al, 1999Birn et al, , 2004Snekvik et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2009]. A return plasma flow may occur at the flanks of the bubble, and the corresponding shear against the plasma flow in the bubble main channel may also be involved in the generation of the field-aligned currents [e.g., Chen and Wolf, 1999;Kauristie et al, 2000;Birn et al, 2004;Keiling et al, 2009;Ohtani et al, 2009;Walsh et al, 2009;Panov et al, 2010aPanov et al, , 2010bBirn et al, 2011;Ge et al, 2011;Pitkänen et al, 2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%