2019
DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giz028
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rice Galaxy: an open resource for plant science

Abstract: Background Rice molecular genetics, breeding, genetic diversity, and allied research (such as rice-pathogen interaction) have adopted sequencing technologies and high-density genotyping platforms for genome variation analysis and gene discovery. Germplasm collections representing rice diversity, improved varieties, and elite breeding materials are accessible through rice gene banks for use in research and breeding, with many having genome sequences and high-density genotype data available. Combini… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To help the breeders with data management, software solutions such as the Breeding Management System (https://bmspro.io), Breeding4Results (B4R) (https://riceinfo.atlassian.net/wiki/ spaces/ABOUT/pages/326172737/Breeding4Results+B4R), Breedbase (https://breedbase.org), or GOBii Genomic Data Management (https://gobiiproject.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/GD/ overview) are available and used in different public organizations. Despite the significant efforts to develop analysis pipelines (like the RiceGalaxy, https://galaxy.irri.org, [141]) and the Breeding API project (https://brapi.org) designed to enable interoperability among plant breeding databases, no efficient end to end solution is publicly available to perform genomic prediction in the context of an applied breeding program. Indeed, several limitations are present among available software for implementing genomic prediction, including a lack of direct linkages between genotypic and phenotypic data, limited multi-environment or multi-trait analytical capability, no possibility to integrate dominance or epistasis effects into a prediction model, and no meaningful integration of weather data into an analytical pipeline.…”
Section: Generate and Integrate Good Quality Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help the breeders with data management, software solutions such as the Breeding Management System (https://bmspro.io), Breeding4Results (B4R) (https://riceinfo.atlassian.net/wiki/ spaces/ABOUT/pages/326172737/Breeding4Results+B4R), Breedbase (https://breedbase.org), or GOBii Genomic Data Management (https://gobiiproject.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/GD/ overview) are available and used in different public organizations. Despite the significant efforts to develop analysis pipelines (like the RiceGalaxy, https://galaxy.irri.org, [141]) and the Breeding API project (https://brapi.org) designed to enable interoperability among plant breeding databases, no efficient end to end solution is publicly available to perform genomic prediction in the context of an applied breeding program. Indeed, several limitations are present among available software for implementing genomic prediction, including a lack of direct linkages between genotypic and phenotypic data, limited multi-environment or multi-trait analytical capability, no possibility to integrate dominance or epistasis effects into a prediction model, and no meaningful integration of weather data into an analytical pipeline.…”
Section: Generate and Integrate Good Quality Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the post-GWAS/QTL mapping task of prioritizing genes or identifying biological mechanisms that link them to the phenotype requires the integration of GWAS/QTL mapping results with genomic information from a host of other data sources. While tools for computational post-GWAS analysis have been reported for other species (e.g., [ 19 , 20 ]), there are a limited number of tools dedicated to rice, one of which is Rice Galaxy [ 21 ] (now folded into CropGalaxy [ 22 ]), which utilizes genome position information and lift-over across a few rice genomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other Circos-derived tools, such as Circoletto ( 2 ), CIRCUS ( 3 ), J-Circos ( 4 ), shinyCircos ( 5 ), Rcircos ( 6 ), Circleator ( 7 ), OmicCircos ( 8 ), ggbio ( 9 ) are either incapable to produce interactive Circos plots in a web browser or are limited to specific data types. Our previous developed tool, BioCircos.js ( 10 ), appears to be the only published software capable of producing interactive Circos plots and has become the state-of-the-art tool in the field ( 11 12 ). Nonetheless, BioCircos.js ( 10 ) implements only nine functional modules, limiting its scope to perform additional analytical tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%